Free Politics Newsletter!

Get these great stories sent directly to your email!

email See more free newsletters on the subscribe page.

Type your email address:

Your email address is safe with us. View our Privacy policy.

Religion:
Enjoy religious news and spiritual inspiration on the religion page
The Funnies:
Get free jokes, comics, and more! See them all on
our funnies page
Games:
Fun online games, quizzes, hangman and more on the games page

Democrats' Policies Based on Dogma, Hopes, Dreams, not Reality

Dennis Prager
How is one to rationally explain the Democrats' belief that the government taking over another one-sixth of the American economy is a good thing?

The answer is religion.

Given the huge economic failures that the left itself attributes to Medicare and Medicaid and given the economic collapse or near collapse of these systems in other countries, the left's prescriptions can only be explained in one way: The left has made its views a form of religion.

Most individuals on the left are not religious, but virtually all people, secular and religious, liberal and conservative, yearn to believe in dogma, i.e., absolute beliefs that transcend reason. For people on the left in Europe, the United States and elsewhere, belief in the state -- the notion that the state can do a better job at helping people and making a good society -- is one such dogma. This applies especially to educating the young and to health care.

Examples of left-wing dogmas that transcend reason are as numerous as any religion's catechism. One example is the belief that men and women, boys and girls, are basically the same, that the vast majority of characteristics we ascribe to male and female natures are in fact socially induced. This irrational dogma was virtually universally believed and taught by the left-wing faculty when I attended college, and remains so today.

Another is the belief that manmade carbon dioxide emissions are heating the world to the point of imminent worldwide catastrophe, including island nations disappearing underwater, mass starvation, inundation of the world's major coastal areas and much more. The fact that the world has been getting colder for the last eight years is as irrelevant to most people on the left as the absence of archaeological evidence for the biblical exodus is irrelevant to believing Jews and Christians. That includes me; I do not believe in the Hebrew exodus from Egypt because of scientific evidence, but because of faith. But unlike the left's belief in manmade carbon emissions leading to unprecedented and calamitous heating of the planet, I admit my belief is a leap of faith. And my belief in the exodus will not ruin Western economies. In other words, my non-scientific belief in the Jews' exodus is innocuous while the left's non-scientific beliefs (though shrouded in scientific jargon and promulgated by scientists who put dogma over science) are forced on societies.

One cannot understand the left if one does not appreciate the world of dogmas in which most left-wing thinkers live. What the monastery is to monks, the university and the mainstream media are to the left.

That is the only way to explain the left's belief that government-run health care, having the government take over so much more of society, raising taxes yet again, expanding government even more and increasing the number of people employed by the government will all be good for America.

Dogma explains why it is useless to point out to the left how the left has economically crippled California, once the most prosperous, most adventurous, most successful "country" in the world (it has an economy that would make it about the seventh largest country in the world). Likewise, it does not matter to blacks what Democrats have done to their cities. As they watch their cities crumble, they will once again vote overwhelmingly for the party that oversaw this destruction.

None of these facts matters because religious-like dogmas are not derived from facts.

In addition to dogma, the left relies for its policies on "hope," which it often substitutes for analysis. People on the left rarely vote based on reality. They vote based on "hope." That's why the word "hope" is so much more significant to the left than to the right. The last two Democratic presidents ran as candidates of "hope." The right doesn't have "hope" candidates because conservatives don't live on hope. They live in reality, meaning that people are not born basically good; that investing men and women with great state power leads inevitably to abuse of that power; that people stop innovating if they are taxed too highly; and that a perfect health care system is understood to be impossible.

And, finally, the left dreams. Robert F. Kennedy often cited the statement first made by George Bernard Shaw: "Some men see things as they are and say 'why?' I dream things that never were and say 'why not?'" The left dreams of an America in which health care will constantly improve, health insurance will be given to every American at the same price irrespective of his or her health, doctors will be fairly reimbursed, there will be no waiting lines, and there will not be a dime's increase in the national debt for all of this.

Frankly, I don't yearn for what is unseen. Rather, having a realistic understanding of the limitations of human beings, I am in awe of what I already see -- the unique American achievement of affluence, liberty, decency, opportunity and medical innovations.

And I see this all being squandered for the sake of left-wing dogma, left-wing hopes and left-wing dreams.

=======

Dennis Prager hosts a nationally syndicated radio talk show and is a visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. He is the author of four books, most recently "Happiness Is a Serious Problem" (HarperCollins). His website is www.dennisprager.com.

Copyright 2009 Creators Syndicate Inc.

This news arrived on: 10/27/2009
Share this Story
Digg   del.icio.us   Yahoo   Facebook   Google   

Printer Friendly Version | Send this page to a friend | Post Comment


Rate This Story:

Great - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Bad




Posted Comments:

10-29-2009 22:52
JCE wrote:



While I agree that casey42 can be very angry and attacking, she does have truth on her side more often than not, and right now. And while I hate to burst HHJs bubble, there is so little evidence of any great Jewish empire, or of the exodus, and what little there is seems to be very controversial. One of the problems with faith, is that sometimes reality collides with it, and it can really be devastating to those who want to believe something that there is little or no evidence of. While Prager is almost always wrong, he was nearly right about that statement. Little evidence, highly controversial, would have been more accurate.
History is never made by reasonable people. It is made by unreasonable people. And true progress by unreasonable people as well. Look at all those saying how wrong it is for the special interests to control and rape us. These unreasonable people won't just let things go on like normal. These unreasonable, unrealistic people want change, for the better, and intend to get it. But you can bet that if we win on health care reform, the republicans will try to rewrite history, and make it look like it was their doing, passing it for the people. And they will use it for reelection purposes if they can. But then, if the people are smart enough to back reform, they are smart enough not to vote republican.



10-29-2009 19:17
Howard wrote:

Casey42s comment

Casey, let me add my statement to your's! I've always said to those stupid people who want to discuss Nuclear Energy when they don't even understand how to turn on a light in their home or why it comes on with the flip of a switch!
"You want to discuss Nuclear Energy? OK, I'll wait here while you go get you weapons! Some of the comments above fit in this catagory!



10-29-2009 13:25
HHJ wrote:



I would take issue with Prager statement that there is absence of archaeoligical evidence of the Jewish Exodus of Egypt. There is such evidence, and incription near a work site in Hebrew donoting the name of the Hebrew God and this site has been dated to the time table given in the Bible. As i have mentioned before, stupidity is defined as doing the same thing over expecting different results. I do not care how much wishful thinking the liberals do, socialism has never worked and will never work to achieve prosperity. What we do know that socialism demeans the human spirit and productivity.



10-29-2009 10:02
casey42 wrote:



I find it very interesting to read that "most people on the left are not religious". Prager has once again shown his stupidity and anti peopls bias. What else can you expect from a right wing extremist?



10-29-2009 09:58
casey42 wrote:



OK Redneck we will make this a personal war, though I usually avoid a war of wits with the witless.

Why do I blame Bush? Let's start with his crooked brother paying crooked election judges to steal the 2000 election for him, then when American troops were needed in Afghanastan he started a totally unnecessary war in Iraq to help build his own and his cronies personal fortunes. When Oil companies were gouging the American people with gas prices over $4.00 a gallon he sat on his assets putting the obscene profits into the bank. His tax cut for the wealthy put the US into a hole that we will never be able to dig out of. His arrogance and total disregard for even basic common sense in the field of diplomacy has created a world that hates the US and fueled anti American fervor all over the world.

Your personal politics of hate and divisiveness show you to be a man 9(if I may use that word loosely) so caught up in himself that he cannot see his neighbor at all.




Comment archive | Comment FAQ's

Post Comment::

Author:
Subject:



Recent archives Featured news

View Politics ezine stories by date or visit the complete archive

Featured Channel: Politics

The ArcaMax Politics channel is one of 70 content categories offered by ArcaMax Publishing on this ...