http://www.arcamax.com/nonfiction/b-1344-2
The Notebooks of Leonardo Da Vinci, Complete
23.
OF THE 10 ATTRIBUTES OF THE EYE, ALL CONCERNED IN PAINTING.
Painting is concerned with all the 10 attributes of sight; which
are:--Darkness, Light, Solidity and Colour, Form and Position,
Distance and Propinquity, Motion and Rest. This little work of mine
will be a tissue [of the studies] of these attributes, reminding the
painter of the rules and methods by which he should use his art to
imitate all the works of Nature which adorn the world.
24.
ON PAINTING.
Variability of the eye.
1st. The pupil of the eye contracts, in proportion to the increase of
light which is reflected in it. 2nd. The pupil of the eye expands in
proportion to the diminution in the day light, or any other light,
that is reflected in it. 3rd. [Footnote: 8. The subject of this third
proposition we find fully discussed in MS. G. 44a.]. The eye perceives
and recognises the objects of its vision with greater intensity in
proportion as the pupil is more widely dilated; and this can be proved
by the case of nocturnal animals, such as cats, and certain birds--as
the owl and others--in which the pupil varies in a high degree from
large to small, &c., when in the dark or in the light. 4th. The eye
[out of doors] in an illuminated atmosphere sees darkness behind the
windows of houses which [nevertheless] are light. 5th. All colours
when placed in the shade appear of an equal degree of darkness, among
themselves. 6th. But all colours when placed in a full light, never
vary from their true and essential hue.
25.
OF THE EYE.
Focus of sight.
If the eye is required to look at an object placed too near to it, it
cannot judge of it well--as happens to a man who tries to see the tip
of his nose. Hence, as a general rule, Nature teaches us that an
object can never be seen perfectly unless the space between it and the
eye is equal, at least, to the length of the face.
Differences of perception by one eye and by both eyes (26-29).
26.
OF THE EYE.
When both eyes direct the pyramid of sight to an object, that object
becomes clearly seen and comprehended by the eyes.
27.
Objects seen by one and the same eye appear sometimes large, and
sometimes small.
28.
The motion of a spectator who sees an object at rest often makes it
seem as though the object at rest had acquired the motion of the
moving body, while the moving person appears to be at rest.
ON PAINTING.
Objects in relief, when seen from a short distance with one eye, look
like a perfect picture. If you look with the eye _a_, _b_ at the spot
_c_, this point _c_ will appear to be at _d_, _f_, and if you look at
it with the eye _g_, _h_ will appear to be at _m_. A picture can never
contain in itself both aspects.
29.
Let the object in relief _t_ be seen by both eyes; if you will look at
the object with the right eye _m_, keeping the left eye _n_ shut, the
object will appear, or fill up the space, at _a_; and if you shut the
right eye and open the left, the object (will occupy the) space _b_;
and if you open both eyes, the object will no longer appear at _a_ or
_b_, but at _e_, _r_, _f_. Why will not a picture seen by both eyes
produce the effect of relief, as [real] relief does when seen by both
eyes; and why should a picture seen with one eye give the same effect
of relief as real relief would under the same conditions of light and
shade?
[Footnote: In the sketch, _m_ is the left eye and _n_ the right, while
the text reverses this lettering. We must therefore suppose that the
face in which the eyes _m_ and _n_ are placed is opposite to the
spectator.]
30.
The comparative size of the image depends on the amount of light
(30-39).
The eye will hold and retain in itself the image of a luminous body
better than that of a shaded object. The reason is that the eye is in
itself perfectly dark and since two things that are alike cannot be
distinguished, therefore the night, and other dark objects cannot be
seen or recognised by the eye. Light is totally contrary and gives
more distinctness, and counteracts and differs from the usual darkness
of the eye, hence it leaves the impression of its image.
31.
Every object we see will appear larger at midnight than at midday, and
larger in the morning than at midday.
This happens because the pupil of the eye is much smaller at midday
than at any other time.
32.
The pupil which is largest will see objects the largest. This is
evident when we look at luminous bodies, and particularly at those in
the sky. When the eye comes out of darkness and suddenly looks up at
these bodies, they at first appear larger and then diminish; and if
you were to look at those bodies through a small opening, you would
see them smaller still, because a smaller part of the pupil would
exercise its function.
[Footnote: 9. _buso_ in the Lomb. dialect is the same as _buco_.]
33.
When the eye, coming out of darkness suddenly sees a luminous body, it
will appear much larger at first sight than after long looking at it.
The illuminated object will look larger and more brilliant, when seen
with two eyes than with only one. A luminous object will appear
smaller in size, when the eye sees it through a smaller opening. A
luminous body of an oval form will appear rounder in proportion as it
is farther from the eye.
34.
Why when the eye has just seen the light, does the half light look
dark to it, and in the same way if it turns from the darkness the half
light look very bright?
35.
ON PAINTING.
If the eye, when [out of doors] in the luminous atmosphere, sees a
place in shadow, this will look very much darker than it really is.
This happens only because the eye when out in the air contracts the
pupil in proportion as the atmosphere reflected in it is more
luminous. And the more the pupil contracts, the less luminous do the
objects appear that it sees. But as soon as the eye enters into a
shady place the darkness of the shadow suddenly seems to diminish.
This occurs because the greater the darkness into which the pupil goes
the more its size increases, and this increase makes the darkness seem
less.
[Footnote 14: _La luce entrera_. _Luce_ occurs here in the sense of
pupil of the eye as in no 51: C. A. 84b; 245a; I--5; and in many other
places.]
36.
ON PERSPECTIVE.
The eye which turns from a white object in the light of the sun and
goes into a less fully lighted place will see everything as dark. And
this happens either because the pupils of the eyes which have rested
on this brilliantly lighted white object have contracted so much that,
given at first a certain extent of surface, they will have lost more
than 3/4 of their size; and, lacking in size, they are also deficient
in [seeing] power. Though you might say to me: A little bird (then)
coming down would see comparatively little, and from the smallness of
his pupils the white might seem black! To this I should reply that
here we must have regard to the proportion of the mass of that portion
of the brain which is given up to the sense of sight and to nothing
else. Or--to return--this pupil in Man dilates and contracts according
to the brightness or darkness of (surrounding) objects; and since it
takes some time to dilate and contract, it cannot see immediately on
going out of the light and into the shade, nor, in the same way, out
of the shade into the light, and this very thing has already deceived
me in painting an eye, and from that I learnt it.
37.
Experiment [showing] the dilatation and contraction of the pupil, from
the motion of the sun and other luminaries. In proportion as the sky
is darker the stars appear of larger size, and if you were to light up
the medium these stars would look smaller; and this difference arises
solely from the pupil which dilates and contracts with the amount of
light in the medium which is interposed between the eye and the
luminous body. Let the experiment be made, by placing a candle above
your head at the same time that you look at a star; then gradually
lower the candle till it is on a level with the ray that comes from
the star to the eye, and then you will see the star diminish so much
that you will almost lose sight of it.
[Footnote: No reference is made in the text to the letters on the
accompanying diagram.]
38.
The pupil of the eye, in the open air, changes in size with every
degree of motion from the sun; and at every degree of its changes one
and the same object seen by it will appear of a different size;
although most frequently the relative scale of surrounding objects
does not allow us to detect these variations in any single object we
may look at.
39.
The eye--which sees all objects reversed--retains the images for some
time. This conclusion is proved by the results; because, the eye
having gazed at light retains some impression of it. After looking (at
it) there remain in the eye images of intense brightness, that make
any less brilliant spot seem dark until the eye has lost the last
trace of the impression of the stronger light.
_II.
Linear Perspective.
We see clearly from the concluding sentence of section 49, where the
author directly addresses the painter, that he must certainly have
intended to include the elements of mathematics in his Book on the art
of Painting. They are therefore here placed at the beginning. In
section 50 the theory of the "Pyramid of Sight" is distinctly and
expressly put forward as the fundamental principle of linear
perspective, and sections 52 to 57 treat of it fully. This theory of
sight can scarcely be traced to any author of antiquity. Such passages
as occur in Euclid for instance, may, it is true, have proved
suggestive to the painters of the Renaissance, but it would be rash to
say any thing decisive on this point.
Leon Battista Alberti treats of the "Pyramid of Sight" at some length
in his first Book of Painting; but his explanation differs widely from
Leonardo's in the details. Leonardo, like Alberti, may have borrowed
the broad lines of his theory from some views commonly accepted among
painters at the time; but he certainly worked out its application in a
perfectly original manner.
The axioms as to the perception of the pyramid of rays are followed by
explanations of its origin, and proofs of its universal application
(58--69). The author recurs to the subject with endless variations; it
is evidently of fundamental importance in his artistic theory and
practice. It is unnecessary to discuss how far this theory has any
scientific value at the present day; so much as this, at any rate,
seems certain: that from the artist's point of view it may still claim
to be of immense practical utility.
According to Leonardo, on one hand, the laws of perspective are an
inalienable condition of the existence of objects in space; on the
other hand, by a natural law, the eye, whatever it sees and wherever
it turns, is subjected to the perception of the pyramid of rays in the
form of a minute target. Thus it sees objects in perspective
independently of the will of the spectator, since the eye receives the
images by means of the pyramid of rays "just as a magnet attracts
iron".
In connection with this we have the function of the eye explained by
the Camera obscura, and this is all the more interesting and important
because no writer previous to Leonardo had treated of this subject_
(70--73). _Subsequent passages, of no less special interest, betray
his knowledge of refraction and of the inversion of the image in the
camera and in the eye_ (74--82).
_From the principle of the transmission of the image to the eye and to
the camera obscura he deduces the means of producing an artificial
construction of the pyramid of rays or--which is the same thing--of
the image. The fundamental axioms as to the angle of sight and the
vanishing point are thus presented in a manner which is as complete as
it is simple and intelligible_ (86--89).
_Leonardo distinguishes between simple and complex perspective_ (90,
91). _The last sections treat of the apparent size of objects at
various distances and of the way to estimate it_ (92--109).
General remarks on perspective (40-41).
40.
ON PAINTING.
Perspective is the best guide to the art of Painting.
[Footnote: 40. Compare 53, 2.]
41.
The art of perspective is of such a nature as to make what is flat
appear in relief and what is in relief flat.
The elements of perspective--Of the Point (42-46).
42.
All the problems of perspective are made clear by the five terms of
mathematicians, which are:--the point, the line, the angle, the
superficies and the solid. The point is unique of its kind. And the
point has neither height, breadth, length, nor depth, whence it is to
be regarded as indivisible and as having no dimensions in space. The
line is of three kinds, straight, curved and sinuous and it has
neither breadth, height, nor depth. Hence it is indivisible, excepting
in its length, and its ends are two points. The angle is the junction
of two lines in a point.
43.
A point is not part of a line.
44.
OF THE NATURAL POINT.
The smallest natural point is larger than all mathematical points, and
this is proved because the natural point has continuity, and any thing
that is continuous is infinitely divisible; but the mathematical point
is indivisible because it has no size.
[Footnote: This definition was inserted by Leonardo on a MS. copy on
parchment of the well-known _"Trattato d'Architettura civile e
militare"_ &c. by FRANCESCO DI GIORGIO; opposite a passage where the
author says: _'In prima he da sapere che punto e quella parie della
quale he nulla--Linia he luncheza senza apieza; &c.]
45.
1, The superficies is a limitation of the body. 2, and the limitation
of a body is no part of that body. 4, and the limitation of one body
is that which begins another. 3, that which is not part of any body is
nothing. Nothing is that which fills no space.
If one single point placed in a circle may be the starting point of an
infinite number of lines, and the termination of an infinite number of
lines, there must be an infinite number of points separable from this
point, and these when reunited become one again; whence it follows
that the part may be equal to the whole.
46.
The point, being indivisible, occupies no space. That which occupies
no space is nothing. The limiting surface of one thing is the
beginning of another. 2. That which is no part of any body is called
nothing. 1. That which has no limitations, has no form. The
limitations of two conterminous bodies are interchangeably the surface
of each. All the surfaces of a body are not parts of that body.
Of the line (47-48).
47.
DEFINITION OF THE NATURE OF THE LINE.
The line has in itself neither matter nor substance and may rather be
called an imaginary idea than a real object; and this being its nature
it occupies no space. Therefore an infinite number of lines may be
conceived of as intersecting each other at a point, which has no
dimensions and is only of the thickness (if thickness it may be
called) of one single line.
HOW WE MAY CONCLUDE THAT A SUPERFICIES TERMINATES IN A POINT?
An angular surface is reduced to a point where it terminates in an
angle. Or, if the sides of that angle are produced in a straight line,
then--beyond that angle--another surface is generated, smaller, or
equal to, or larger than the first.
48.
OF DRAWING OUTLINE.
Consider with the greatest care the form of the outlines of every
object, and the character of their undulations. And these undulations
must be separately studied, as to whether the curves are composed of
arched convexities or angular concavities.
49.
The nature of the outline.
The boundaries of bodies are the least of all things. The proposition
is proved to be true, because the boundary of a thing is a surface,
which is not part of the body contained within that surface; nor is it
part of the air surrounding that body, but is the medium interposted
between the air and the body, as is proved in its place. But the
lateral boundaries of these bodies is the line forming the boundary of
the surface, which line is of invisible thickness. Wherefore O
painter! do not surround your bodies with lines, and above all when
representing objects smaller than nature; for not only will their
external outlines become indistinct, but their parts will be invisible
from distance.
50.
Definition of Perspective.
[Drawing is based upon perspective, which is nothing else than a
thorough knowledge of the function of the eye. And this function
simply consists in receiving in a pyramid the forms and colours of all
the objects placed before it. I say in a pyramid, because there is no
object so small that it will not be larger than the spot where these
pyramids are received into the eye. Therefore, if you extend the lines
from the edges of each body as they converge you will bring them to a
single point, and necessarily the said lines must form a pyramid.]
[Perspective is nothing more than a rational demonstration applied to
the consideration of how objects in front of the eye transmit their
image to it, by means of a pyramid of lines. The _Pyramid_ is the name
I apply to the lines which, starting from the surface and edges of
each object, converge from a distance and meet in a single point.]
[Perspective is a rational demonstration, by which we may practically
and clearly understand how objects transmit their own image, by lines
forming a Pyramid (centred) in the eye.]
Perspective is a rational demonstration by which experience confirms
that every object sends its image to the eye by a pyramid of lines;
and bodies of equal size will result in a pyramid of larger or smaller
size, according to the difference in their distance, one from the
other. By a pyramid of lines I mean those which start from the surface
and edges of bodies, and, converging from a distance meet in a single
point. A point is said to be that which [having no dimensions] cannot
be divided, and this point placed in the eye receives all the points
of the cone.
[Footnote: 50. 1-5. Compare with this the Proem. No. 21. The
paragraphs placed in brackets: lines 1-9, 10-14, and 17--20, are
evidently mere sketches and, as such, were cancelled by the writer;
but they serve as a commentary on the final paragraph, lines 22-29.]
51.
IN WHAT WAY THE EYE SEES OBJECTS PLACED IN FRONT OF IT.
The perception of the object depends on the direction of the eye.
Supposing that the ball figured above is the ball of the eye and let
the small portion of the ball which is cut off by the line _s t_ be
the pupil and all the objects mirrored on the centre of the face of
the eye, by means of the pupil, pass on at once and enter the pupil,
passing through the crystalline humour, which does not interfere in
the pupil with the things seen by means of the light. And the pupil
having received the objects, by means of the light, immediately refers
them and transmits them to the intellect by the line _a b_. And you
must know that the pupil transmits nothing perfectly to the intellect
or common sense excepting when the objects presented to it by means of
light, reach it by the line _a b;_ as, for instance, by the line _b
c_. For although the lines _m n_ and _f g_ may be seen by the pupil
they are not perfectly taken in, because they do not coincide with the
line _a b_. And the proof is this: If the eye, shown above, wants to
count the letters placed in front, the eye will be obliged to turn
from letter to letter, because it cannot discern them unless they lie
in the line _a b;_ as, for instance, in the line _a c_. All visible
objects reach the eye by the lines of a pyramid, and the point of the
pyramid is the apex and centre of it, in the centre of the pupil, as
figured above.
[Footnote: 51. In this problem the eye is conceived of as fixed and
immovable; this is plain from line 11.]
Experimental proof of the existence of the pyramid of sight (52-55).
52.
Perspective is a rational demonstration, confirmed by experience, that
all objects transmit their image to the eye by a pyramid of lines.
By a pyramid of lines I understand those lines which start from the
edges of the surface of bodies, and converging from a distance, meet
in a single point; and this point, in the present instance, I will
show to be situated in the eye which is the universal judge of all
objects. By a point I mean that which cannot be divided into parts;
therefore this point, which is situated in the eye, being indivisible,
no body is seen by the eye, that is not larger than this point. This
being the case it is inevitable that the lines which come from the
object to the point must form a pyramid. And if any man seeks to prove
that the sense of sight does not reside in this point, but rather in
the black spot which is visible in the middle of the pupil, I might
reply to him that a small object could never diminish at any distance,
as it might be a grain of millet or of oats or of some similar thing,
and that object, if it were larger than the said [black] spot would
never be seen as a whole; as may be seen in the diagram below. Let
_a_. be the seat of sight, _b e_ the lines which reach the eye. Let _e
d_ be the grains of millet within these lines. You plainly see that
these will never diminish by distance, and that the body _m n_ could
not be entirely covered by it. Therefore you must confess that the eye
contains within itself one single indivisible point _a_, to which all
the points converge of the pyramid of lines starting from an object,
as is shown below. Let _a_. _b_. be the eye; in the centre of it is
the point above mentioned. If the line _e f_ is to enter as an image
into so small an opening in the eye, you must confess that the smaller
object cannot enter into what is smaller than itself unless it is
diminished, and by diminishing it must take the form of a pyramid.
53.
PERSPECTIVE.
Perspective comes in where judgment fails [as to the distance] in
objects which diminish. The eye can never be a true judge for
determining with exactitude how near one object is to another which is
equal to it [in size], if the top of that other is on the level of the
eye which sees them on that side, excepting by means of the vertical
plane which is the standard and guide of perspective. Let _n_ be the
eye, _e f_ the vertical plane above mentioned. Let _a b c d_ be the
three divisions, one below the other; if the lines _a n_ and _c n_ are
of a given length and the eye _n_ is in the centre, then _a b_ will
look as large as _b c. c d_ is lower and farther off from _n_,
therefore it will look smaller. And the same effect will appear in the
three divisions of a face when the eye of the painter who is drawing
it is on a level with the eye of the person he is painting.
54.
TO PROVE HOW OBJECTS REACH THE EYE.
If you look at the sun or some other luminous body and then shut your
eyes you will see it again inside your eye for a long time. This is
evidence that images enter into the eye.
The relations of the distance points to the vanishing point (55-56).
55.
ELEMENTS OF PERSPECTIVE.
All objects transmit their image to the eye in pyramids, and the
nearer to the eye these pyramids are intersected the smaller will the
image appear of the objects which cause them. Therefore, you may
intersect the pyramid with a vertical plane [Footnote 4: _Pariete_.
Compare the definitions in 85, 2-5, 6-27. These lines refer
exclusively to the third diagram. For the better understanding of this
it should be observed that _c s_ must be regarded as representing the
section or profile of a square plane, placed horizontally (comp. lines
11, 14, 17) for which the word _pianura_ is subsequently employed (20,
22). Lines 6-13 contain certain preliminary observations to guide the
reader in understanding the diagram; the last three seem to have been
added as a supplement. Leonardo's mistake in writing _t denota_ (line
6) for _f denota_ has been rectified.] which reaches the base of the
pyramid as is shown in the plane _a n_.
The eye _f_ and the eye _t_ are one and the same thing; but the eye
_f_ marks the distance, that is to say how far you are standing from
the object; and the eye _t_ shows you the direction of it; that is
whether you are opposite, or on one side, or at an angle to the object
you are looking at. And remember that the eye _f_ and the eye _t_ must
always be kept on the same level. For example if you raise or lower
the eye from the distance point _f_ you must do the same with the
direction point _t_. And if the point _f_ shows how far the eye is
distant from the square plane but does not show on which side it is
placed--and, if in the same way, the point _t_ show _s_ the direction
and not the distance, in order to ascertain both you must use both
points and they will be one and the same thing. If the eye _f_ could
see a perfect square of which all the sides were equal to the distance
between _s_ and _c_, and if at the nearest end of the side towards the
eye a pole were placed, or some other straight object, set up by a
perpendicular line as shown at _r s_--then, I say, that if you were to
look at the side of the square that is nearest to you it will appear
at the bottom of the vertical plane _r s_, and then look at the
farther side and it would appear to you at the height of the point _n_
on the vertical plane. Thus, by this example, you can understand that
if the eye is above a number of objects all placed on the same level,
one beyond another, the more remote they are the higher they will
seem, up to the level of the eye, but no higher; because objects
placed upon the level on which your feet stand, so long as it is
flat--even if it be extended into infinity--would never be seen above
the eye; since the eye has in itself the point towards which all the
cones tend and converge which convey the images of the objects to the
eye. And this point always coincides with the point of diminution
which is the extreme of all we can see. And from the base line of the
first pyramid as far as the diminishing point
[Footnote: The two diagrams above the chapter are explained by the
first five lines. They have, however, more letters than are referred
to in the text, a circumstance we frequently find occasion to remark.]
56.
there are only bases without pyramids which constantly diminish up to
this point. And from the first base where the vertical plane is placed
towards the point in the eye there will be only pyramids without
bases; as shown in the example given above. Now, let _a b_ be the said
vertical plane and _r_ the point of the pyramid terminating in the
eye, and _n_ the point of diminution which is always in a straight
line opposite the eye and always moves as the eye moves--just as when
a rod is moved its shadow moves, and moves with it, precisely as the
shadow moves with a body. And each point is the apex of a pyramid, all
having a common base with the intervening vertical plane. But although
their bases are equal their angles are not equal, because the
diminishing point is the termination of a smaller angle than that of
the eye. If you ask me: "By what practical experience can you show me
these points?" I reply--so far as concerns the diminishing point which
moves with you --when you walk by a ploughed field look at the
straight furrows which come down with their ends to the path where you
are walking, and you will see that each pair of furrows will look as
though they tried to get nearer and meet at the [farther] end.
[Footnote: For the easier understanding of the diagram and of its
connection with the preceding I may here remark that the square plane
shown above in profile by the line _c s_ is here indicated by _e d o
p_. According to lines 1, 3 _a b_ must be imagined as a plane of glass
placed perpendicularly at _o p_.]
57.
How to measure the pyramid of vision.
As regards the point in the eye; it is made more intelligible by this:
If you look into the eye of another person you will see your own
image. Now imagine 2 lines starting from your ears and going to the
ears of that image which you see in the other man's eye; you will
understand that these lines converge in such a way that they would
meet in a point a little way beyond your own image mirrored in the
eye. And if you want to measure the diminution of the pyramid in the
air which occupies the space between the object seen and the eye, you
must do it according to the diagram figured below. Let _m n_ be a
tower, and _e f_ a, rod, which you must move backwards and forwards
till its ends correspond with those of the tower [Footnote 9: _I sua
stremi .. della storre_ (its ends ... of the tower) this is the case
at _e f_.]; then bring it nearer to the eye, at _c d_ and you will see
that the image of the tower seems smaller, as at _r o_. Then [again]
bring it closer to the eye and you will see the rod project far beyond
the image of the tower from _a_ to _b_ and from _t_ to _b_, and so you
will discern that, a little farther within, the lines must converge in
a point.
The Production of pyramid of Vision (58-60).
58.
PERSPECTIVE.
The instant the atmosphere is illuminated it will be filled with an
infinite number of images which are produced by the various bodies and
colours assembled in it. And the eye is the target, a loadstone, of
these images.
59.
The whole surface of opaque bodies displays its whole image in all the
illuminated atmosphere which surrounds them on all sides.
60.
That the atmosphere attracts to itself, like a loadstone, all the
images of the objects that exist in it, and not their forms merely but
their nature may be clearly seen by the sun, which is a hot and
luminous body. All the atmosphere, which is the all-pervading matter,
absorbs light and heat, and reflects in itself the image of the source
of that heat and splendour and, in each minutest portion, does the
same. The Northpole does the same as the loadstone shows; and the moon
and the other planets, without suffering any diminution, do the same.
Among terrestrial things musk does the same and other perfumes.
61.
All bodies together, and each by itself, give off to the surrounding
air an infinite number of images which are all-pervading and each
complete, each conveying the nature, colour and form of the body which
produces it.
It can clearly be shown that all bodies are, by their images,
all-pervading in the surrounding atmosphere, and each complete in
itself as to substance form and colour; this is seen by the images of
the various bodies which are reproduced in one single perforation
through which they transmit the objects by lines which intersect and
cause reversed pyramids, from the objects, so that they are upside
down on the dark plane where they are first reflected. The reason of
this is--
[Footnote: The diagram intended to illustrate the statement (Pl. II
No. i) occurs in the original between lines 3 and 4. The three circles
must be understood to represent three luminous bodies which transmit
their images through perforations in a wall into a dark chamber,
according to a law which is more fully explained in 75?81. So far as
concerns the present passage the diagram is only intended to explain
that the images of the three bodies may be made to coalesce at any
given spot. In the circles are written, giallo--yellow, biacho--white,
rosso--red.
The text breaks off at line 8. The paragraph No.40 follows here in the
original MS.]
62.
Every point is the termination of an infinite number of lines, which
diverge to form a base, and immediately, from the base the same lines
converge to a pyramid [imaging] both the colour and form. No sooner is
a form created or compounded than suddenly infinite lines and angles
are produced from it; and these lines, distributing themselves and
intersecting each other in the air, give rise to an infinite number of
angles opposite to each other. Given a base, each opposite angle, will
form a triangle having a form and proportion equal to the larger
angle; and if the base goes twice into each of the 2 lines of the
pyramid the smaller triangle will do the same.
63.
Every body in light and shade fills the surrounding air with infinite
images of itself; and these, by infinite pyramids diffused in the air,
represent this body throughout space and on every side. Each pyramid
that is composed of a long assemblage of rays includes within itself
an infinite number of pyramids and each has the same power as all, and
all as each. A circle of equidistant pyramids of vision will give to
their object angles of equal size; and an eye at each point will see
the object of the same size. The body of the atmosphere is full of
infinite pyramids composed of radiating straight lines, which are
produced from the surface of the bodies in light and shade, existing
in the air; and the farther they are from the object which produces
them the more acute they become and although in their distribution
they intersect and cross they never mingle together, but pass through
all the surrounding air, independently converging, spreading, and
diffused. And they are all of equal power [and value]; all equal to
each, and each equal to all. By these the images of objects are
transmitted through all space and in every direction, and each
pyramid, in itself, includes, in each minutest part, the whole form of
the body causing it.
64.
The body of the atmosphere is full of infinite radiating pyramids
produced by the objects existing in it. These intersect and cross each
other with independent convergence without interfering with each other
and pass through all the surrounding atmosphere; and are of equal
force and value--all being equal to each, each to all. And by means of
these, images of the body are transmitted everywhere and on all sides,
and each receives in itself every minutest portion of the object that
produces it.
Proof by experiment (65-66).
65.
PERSPECTIVE.
The air is filled with endless images of the objects distributed in
it; and all are represented in all, and all in one, and all in each,
whence it happens that if two mirrors are placed in such a manner as
to face each other exactly, the first will be reflected in the second
and the second in the first. The first being reflected in the second
takes to it the image of itself with all the images represented in it,
among which is the image of the second mirror, and so, image within
image, they go on to infinity in such a manner as that each mirror has
within it a mirror, each smaller than the last and one inside the
other. Thus, by this example, it is clearly proved that every object
sends its image to every spot whence the object itself can be seen;
and the converse: That the same object may receive in itself all the
images of the objects that are in front of it. Hence the eye transmits
through the atmosphere its own image to all the objects that are in
front of it and receives them into itself, that is to say on its
surface, whence they are taken in by the common sense, which considers
them and if they are pleasing commits them to the memory. Whence I am
of opinion: That the invisible images in the eyes are produced towards
the object, as the image of the object to the eye. That the images of
the objects must be disseminated through the air. An instance may be
seen in several mirrors placed in a circle, which will reflect each
other endlessly. When one has reached the other it is returned to the
object that produced it, and thence--being diminished--it is returned
again to the object and then comes back once more, and this happens
endlessly. If you put a light between two flat mirrors with a distance
of 1 braccio between them you will see in each of them an infinite
number of lights, one smaller than another, to the last. If at night
you put a light between the walls of a room, all the parts of that
wall will be tinted with the image of that light. And they will
receive the light and the light will fall on them, mutually, that is
to say, when there is no obstacle to interrupt the transmission of the
images. This same example is seen in a greater degree in the
distribution of the solar rays which all together, and each by itself,
convey to the object the image of the body which causes it. That each
body by itself alone fills with its images the atmosphere around it,
and that the same air is able, at the same time, to receive the images
of the endless other objects which are in it, this is clearly proved
by these examples. And every object is everywhere visible in the whole
of the atmosphere, and the whole in every smallest part of it; and all
the objects in the whole, and all in each smallest part; each in all
and all in every part.
66.
The images of objects are all diffused through the atmosphere which
receives them; and all on every side in it. To prove this, let _a c e_
be objects of which the images are admitted to a dark chamber by the
small holes _n p_ and thrown upon the plane _f i_ opposite to these
holes. As many images will be produced in the chamber on the plane as
the number of the said holes.
67.
General conclusions.
All objects project their whole image and likeness, diffused and
mingled in the whole of the atmosphere, opposite to themselves. The
image of every point of the bodily surface, exists in every part of
the atmosphere. All the images of the objects are in every part of the
atmosphere. The whole, and each part of the image of the atmosphere is
[reflected] in each point of the surface of the bodies presented to
it. Therefore both the part and the whole of the images of the objects
exist, both in the whole and in the parts of the surface of these
visible bodies. Whence we may evidently say that the image of each
object exists, as a whole and in every part, in each part and in the
whole interchangeably in every existing body. As is seen in two
mirrors placed opposite to each other.
68.
That the contrary is impossible.
It is impossible that the eye should project from itself, by visual
rays, the visual virtue, since, as soon as it opens, that front
portion [of the eye] which would give rise to this emanation would
have to go forth to the object and this it could not do without time.
And this being so, it could not travel so high as the sun in a month's
time when the eye wanted to see it. And if it could reach the sun it
would necessarily follow that it should perpetually remain in a
continuous line from the eye to the sun and should always diverge in
such a way as to form between the sun and the eye the base and the
apex of a pyramid. This being the case, if the eye consisted of a
million worlds, it would not prevent its being consumed in the
projection of its virtue; and if this virtue would have to travel
through the air as perfumes do, the winds would bent it and carry it
into another place. But we do [in fact] see the mass of the sun with
the same rapidity as [an object] at the distance of a braccio, and the
power of sight is not disturbed by the blowing of the winds nor by any
other accident.
[Footnote: The view here refuted by Leonardo was maintained among
others by Bramantino, Leonardo's Milanese contemporary. LOMAZZO writes
as follows in his Trattato dell' Arte della pittura &c. (Milano 1584.
Libr. V cp. XXI): Sovviemmi di aver gia letto in certi scritti alcune
cose di Bramantino milanese, celebratissimo pittore, attenente alla
prospettiva, le quali ho voluto riferire, e quasi intessere in questo
luogo, affinche sappiamo qual fosse l'opinione di cosi chiaro e famoso
pittore intorno alla prospettiva . . Scrive Bramantino che la
prospettiva e una cosa che contrafa il naturale, e che cio si fa in
tre modi
Circa il primo modo che si fa con ragione, per essere la cosa in poche
parole conclusa da Bramantino in maniera che giudico non potersi dir
meglio, contenendovi si tutta Parte del principio al fine, io riferiro
per appunto le proprie parole sue (cp. XXII, Prima prospettiva di
Bramantino). La prima prospettiva fa le cose di punto, e l'altra non
mai, e la terza piu appresso. Adunque la prima si dimanda prospettiva,
cioe ragione, la quale fa l'effetto dell' occhio, facendo crescere e
calare secondo gli effetti degli occhi. Questo crescere e calare non
procede della cosa propria, che in se per esser lontana, ovvero
vicina, per quello effetto non puo crescere e sminuire, ma procede
dagli effetti degli occhi, i quali sono piccioli, e percio volendo
vedere tanto gran cosa_, bisogna che mandino fuora la virtu visiva,
_la quale si dilata in tanta larghezza, che piglia tutto quello che
vuoi vedere, ed_ arrivando a quella cosa la vede dove e: _e da lei
agli occhi per quello circuito fino all' occhio, e tutto quello
termine e pieno di quella cosa_.
It is worthy of note that Leonardo had made his memorandum refuting
this view, at Milan in 1492]
69.
A parallel case.
Just as a stone flung into the water becomes the centre and cause of
many circles, and as sound diffuses itself in circles in the air: so
any object, placed in the luminous atmosphere, diffuses itself in
circles, and fills the surrounding air with infinite images of itself.
And is repeated, the whole every-where, and the whole in every
smallest part. This can be proved by experiment, since if you shut a
window that faces west and make a hole [Footnote: 6. Here the text
breaks off.] . .
[Footnote: Compare LIBRI, _Histoire des sciences mathematiques en
Italie_. Tome III, p. 43.]
The function of the eye as explained by the camera obscura (70. 71).
70.
If the object in front of the eye sends its image to the eye, the eye,
on the other hand, sends its image to the object, and no portion
whatever of the object is lost in the images it throws off, for any
reason either in the eye or the object. Therefore we may rather
believe it to be the nature and potency of our luminous atmosphere
which absorbs the images of the objects existing in it, than the
nature of the objects, to send their images through the air. If the
object opposite to the eye were to send its image to the eye, the eye
would have to do the same to the object, whence it might seem that
these images were an emanation. But, if so, it would be necessary [to
admit] that every object became rapidly smaller; because each object
appears by its images in the surrounding atmosphere. That is: the
whole object in the whole atmosphere, and in each part; and all the
objects in the whole atmosphere and all of them in each part; speaking
of that atmosphere which is able to contain in itself the straight and
radiating lines of the images projected by the objects. From this it
seems necessary to admit that it is in the nature of the atmosphere,
which subsists between the objects, and which attracts the images of
things to itself like a loadstone, being placed between them.
PROVE HOW ALL OBJECTS, PLACED IN ONE POSITION, ARE ALL EVERYWHERE AND
ALL IN EACH PART.
I say that if the front of a building--or any open piazza or
field--which is illuminated by the sun has a dwelling opposite to it,
and if, in the front which does not face the sun, you make a small
round hole, all the illuminated objects will project their images
through that hole and be visible inside the dwelling on the opposite
wall which may be made white; and there, in fact, they will be upside
down, and if you make similar openings in several places in the same
wall you will have the same result from each. Hence the images of the
illuminated objects are all everywhere on this wall and all in each
minutest part of it. The reason, as we clearly know, is that this hole
must admit some light to the said dwelling, and the light admitted by
it is derived from one or many luminous bodies. If these bodies are of
various colours and shapes the rays forming the images are of various
colours and shapes, and so will the representations be on the wall.
[Footnote: 70. 15--23. This section has already been published in the
"_Saggio delle Opere di Leonardo da Vinci_" Milan 1872, pp. 13, 14. G.
Govi observes upon it, that Leonardo is not to be regarded as the
inventor of the Camera obscura, but that he was the first to explain
by it the structure of the eye. An account of the Camera obscura first
occurs in CESARE CESARINI's Italian version of Vitruvius, pub. 1523,
four years after Leonardo's death. Cesarini expressly names
Benedettino Don Papnutio as the inventor of the Camera obscura. In his
explanation of the function of the eye by a comparison with the Camera
obscura Leonardo was the precursor of G. CARDANO, Professor of
Medicine at Bologna (died 1576) and it appears highly probable that
this is, in fact, the very discovery which Leonardo ascribes to
himself in section 21 without giving any further details.]
71.
HOW THE IMAGES OF OBJECTS RECEIVED BY THE EYE INTERSECT WITHIN THE
CRYSTALLINE HUMOUR OF THE EYE.
An experiment, showing how objects transmit their images or pictures,
intersecting within the eye in the crystalline humour, is seen when by
some small round hole penetrate the images of illuminated objects into
a very dark chamber. Then, receive these images on a white paper
placed within this dark room and rather near to the hole and you will
see all the objects on the paper in their proper forms and colours,
but much smaller; and they will be upside down by reason of that very
intersection. These images being transmitted from a place illuminated
by the sun will seem actually painted on this paper which must be
extremely thin and looked at from behind. And let the little
perforation be made in a very thin plate of iron. Let _a b e d e_ be
the object illuminated by the sun and _o r_ the front of the dark
chamber in which is the said hole at _n m_. Let _s t_ be the sheet of
paper intercepting the rays of the images of these objects upside
down, because the rays being straight, _a_ on the right hand becomes
_k_ on the left, and _e_ on the left becomes _f_ on the right; and the
same takes place inside the pupil.
[Footnote: This chapter is already known through a translation into
French by VENTURI. Compare his '_Essai sur les ouvrages
physico-mathematiques de L. da Vinci avec des fragments tires de ses
Manuscrits, apportes de l'Italie. Lu a la premiere classe de
l'Institut national des Sciences et Arts.' Paris, An V_ (1797).]
The practice of perspective (72. 73).
72.
In the practice of perspective the same rules apply to light and to
the eye.
73.
The object which is opposite to the pupil of the eye is seen by that
pupil and that which is opposite to the eye is seen by the pupil.
Refraction of the rays falling upon the eye (74. 75)
74.
The lines sent forth by the image of an object to the eye do not reach
the point within the eye in straight lines.
75.
If the judgment of the eye is situated within it, the straight lines
of the images are refracted on its surface because they pass through
the rarer to the denser medium. If, when you are under water, you look
at objects in the air you will see them out of their true place; and
the same with objects under water seen from the air.
The intersection of the rays (76-82).