Betty G. is quite right. There was no justification for the Iraq War. There were no wmd's in Iraq, and absolutely no contact between the Iraqui regime and Al Quaida. The reasons given for the invasion were completely unjustified, and history will judge Goerge bush and Tony Blair accordingly. Now why don't we pull out and leave the country to the Iraquis (before any greater MESS is made).
They are mainly a gentle people greatly suffering as a result of this phoney "war" on terror.

When are you folks going to give up on this lost cause? There were not WMD and Saddam had nothing to do with bin Laden. Even your own man, Bush finally admitted this.

Give it a rest and quit trying to compare it to any way with WWII.

This administration blew it big time and you will just have to live with that and all the deaths the rest of your lives.

What you say might be true, but so is North Korea and Iran a major threat. What are we doing to keep them from becoming a nuclear threat? We have used up all of our resources on this useless war.

If the decision to invade was based solely on the possession of WMDs and the prior history of their use, there would also have been ample reason to suspect that, if a mad man, under threat of violent removal from office, he most certainly would use them again, especially against an invading force, the American Army. It must have given unit commanders the highest degree of doubt when, upon arriving near Baghdad, no WMDs were used against their troops. Although it was certainly too late to change the course of action predicated on the assumption of WMDs. Evidently they would not be a threat to our well-equipped troops.
Something does not add up and we are just as ignorant as the intelligence community was (is?).