Get these FREE newsletters in your email!

Joe Conason

See more great free newsletters
on the subscribe page.

Type your email address:

Your email address is safe with us. View our Privacy policy.

Religion:
Enjoy religious news and spiritual inspiration on the religion page
The Funnies:
Get free jokes, comics, and more! See them all on
our funnies page
Author Bio:
Before starting his popular political column for the New York Observer, Joe Conason worked as editor-at-large for Conde Nast's Details magazine. ...

Read more about Joe Conason.
Books:
Read the classics online or by email. More details on the books page
Games:
Fun online games, quizzes, hangman and more on the games page
Joe Conason

Why Bristol's Baby Matters

Joe Conason
Families deserve privacy about family matters, but families that want absolute privacy should stay out of politics. Sooner or later someone would have noticed the pregnancy of Bristol Palin, 17-year-old daughter of John McCain's vice-presidential pick, especially since everyone in her hometown of Wasilla, Alaska, seemed to know already.

The question that remains is what, if anything, her plight may portend for the rest of us.

With all due respect to this young woman, her future husband and the rest of the family -- and best wishes to all of them for a successful birth -- let us first stop pretending that this is good news. There are excellent reasons why we discourage teenage pregnancy and motherhood, and none of them have disappeared simply because the Republicans are about to put Sarah Palin on their ticket.

Adolescents are rarely prepared to take on the challenges of raising a child. Often they drop out of school as a result, and usually become dependent on their own parents for support (which may be complicated for a family whose mom is running for vice president). Pregnancies in adolescence are high-risk, and the babies born to teenage mothers tend to have more illnesses during their first year of life. Teenage marriages -- whether or not they occur because of an unplanned pregnancy -- have a tendency to work out poorly, too. ("I don't want to have kids," noted Bristol Palin's prospective husband Levi Johnston, 18, on his MySpace page, according to the New York Post, and at his age, why would he?)

But such is life in the red states, where sensible sex education and availability of contraceptives are discouraged for adolescents, even though they are just as sexually active as teenagers everywhere else. Despite the supposed religious purity of the evangelical right-wingers who today regard themselves as the base of the Republican Party, rates of teenage pregnancy and divorce tend to be higher in their domain than elsewhere in America. To the extent that their values would dominate for another four years of Republican rule, those pathologies can be expected to prevail. During the past four years of the Bush administration, teen pregnancies have increased for the first time since 1990, when they began a 14-year decline.

That is why the story of Bristol Palin raises a serious public policy issue. If we have acquired too much information about her, we may not yet have learned quite enough about her mother (just like those hapless vetters of her candidacy in the McCain campaign).

It seems fair to assume, however, that Sarah Palin's enthusiasm for "abstinence-only" sex education, which is shared by Sen. McCain, helped to cause her daughter's misfortune. As a politician who insists on lecturing adolescents to abstain without teaching them about contraception, she may never have informed Bristol how to protect herself from an unwanted pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease. Her views on reproductive rights -- including opposition to abortion even in cases of rape and incest -- are too extreme even for her running mate.

The Alaska governor probably assumed that her daughter -- no doubt a regular churchgoer like the rest of the family -- was saving herself for marriage according to religious doctrine. Meanwhile, daughter Bristol probably understood that Mom, loving but ambitious and deeply dogmatic, was the last person she dared to ask for advice on birth control.

Surely Sarah and Todd Palin as well as their church gave Bristol a clear message that she should avoid premarital sex. But what we know now is abstinence-only education, whether at school or in the home, fails at least as often as it succeeds. The religious morality of the evangelical right, preaching the return of the sexual mores of decades ago, is no more likely to succeed. If we are to protect young men and women against the consequences of their desire -- and reduce the rate of abortion, which people like the Palins supposedly abhor -- then we ought to be making comprehensive sex education and contraceptives available to everyone.

========

Joe Conason writes for the New York Observer (www.observer.com). To find out more about Joe Conason, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

Copyright 2008 Creators Syndicate Inc.

This news arrived on: 09/04/2008
Share this Story
Digg   del.icio.us   Yahoo   Facebook   Google   

Printer Friendly Version | Send this page to a friend | Post Comment


Rate This Story:

Great - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Bad




Posted Comments:

09-09-2008 17:04
John wrote:

Baby Matters

I am 62 and was a farther at 17 I wish to day sex ed.was taught when I was in grade school,the truth be told some of us think about sex at an early age.The human body is programed for a certain time and age for the natural to happen.Abstinence condoms or sex ed.want stop it but to me sex ed.is the best way to go.Religion and morals aint got nothing to do with it.That woman talking about teens dont think about sex untill 14-16 is way off.Religion that man made stuff is the whole problem.



09-07-2008 12:31
Stephanie wrote:



So, telling our kids that having sex is okay as long as they use a condom is the way to go? I'm pretty sure condoms are only 80-90% effective, and, let's face it, a lot of kids having sex don't have other forms of contraception and can't afford to. Instilling good morals in children is the way to go. I'm 18 and I am a virgin; I went to a school loaded to the max with extremely liberal peers and teachers; I had sex ed my freshman year at the age of 14, as well as in elementary AND middle school. However, I know that I can still get pregnant, and that I, as a Christian whose parents raised her well, will not have sex until I am fiscally able to have children and get married. It IS possible. I did it; anyone else can do it. It's about teaching the children correctly.

Now, that being said, it is also the teenager's choice whether or not to have sex, regardless of how well he or she was raised. Such is the case I am assuming happened with Palin's daughter, and as a peer, I applaud her for not having an abortion and taking responsibility to give her child a good life and a loving family. I support her decision. People make mistakes; what is important is that Palin forgave her daughter for going against what she was taught and supporting her and the baby's father.



09-07-2008 02:45
Sunshine49 wrote:

To phyllba

At the time the Bible was written, children didn't have "teen" years. They were taught responsibility from the time they could crawl and considered to be old enough to know the difference between right and wrong by the time they were 12. Even here in the U.S., during the 1700s and 1800s, women were getting married and having babies at 15 and 16 years old. Over 50% of women died in childbirth by age 30 until the 1900s. It's only our 'new age' thinking that has changed what was accepted as normal for hundreds of years. Both boys and girls understood procreation. They didn't need to be taught in a school. They knew and understood moral values. Now, the government has taken away parent's rights to discipline, taken away any reference to religion or morals in school and replaced it with sex education. Is it any wonder that young people don't know the difference between right and wrong. Don't blame Palin -- Thank the government!



09-06-2008 20:34
Linda wrote:

Baby matters

At least she is having the child.Better than some that abort their own flesh and blood. Tell me who didn't have sex before they were married? Children 10-13 shouldn't have sex ed at school. They(schools)are planting seeds of though that shouldn't be there. Most teens don't think about sex until 14 or 15.



09-06-2008 19:25
Wapite wrote:

Teenage Pregnancy

The pro-choice people blame the pro-life people for their kids getting pregnant because of lack of sex education & the teaching that abstinence is the best "birth control" from both a physical & social standpoint. I am 84 yrs. old and let me tell you younger parents, my generation knew about birth control, no matter how strictly reiigious our parents were. No, we didn't have "sex education" courses in school, but we did have Biology! Duh! How stupid do you this our young folks are? Certainly the "facts of life" are pretty generally known among our kids, even without the Karma Sutra!




Comment archive | Comment FAQ's

Post Comment::

Author:
Subject:



Recent archives Featured news

View Joe Conason ezine stories by date or visit the complete archive

Featured Channel: Politics

The ArcaMax Politics channel is one of 70 content categories offered by ArcaMax Publishing on this ...