Get these FREE newsletters in your email!

Dick Morris

See more great free newsletters
on the subscribe page.

Type your email address:

Your email address is safe with us. View our Privacy policy.

Religion:
Enjoy religious news and spiritual inspiration on the religion page
The Funnies:
Get free jokes, comics, and more! See them all on
our funnies page
Author Bio:
Political consultant Dick Morris has been credited with turning around Bill Clinton's campaign, leading to his second term as President. In ...

Read more about Dick Morris.
Books:
Read the classics online or by email. More details on the books page
Games:
Fun online games, quizzes, hangman and more on the games page
Dick Morris

Rebutting Obama's Health Care Speech

Dick Morris
In his hour-long speech on health care, Barack Obama failed to spend even a moment rebutting the central critique of his program: His inability to provide quality medical care for 30 million new patients without any additional doctors or nurses.

The shortage of medical personnel that will inevitably accompany the expansion of the patient population will leave some element -- and perhaps all -- without adequate care. Like the man who sleeps with a blanket that is too small, either his neck or his feet will get cold unless he gets a bigger blanket.

The result of expanding the demand for medical services without augmenting the supply of doctors or nurses must be the rationing of medical care. And rationing will inevitably take its greatest toll among the elderly, forcing them to forgo elective surgery or, if their remaining quality years are likely to be limited, to do without vital life-prolonging treatment. Inevitably, we will all have to wait many more days, weeks, months or years for care we now receive on demand.

Obama will cut Medicare and that portion of Medicaid which serves the elderly in nursing homes (75 percent) in two ways:

-- As he said in his speech, he will cut "hundreds of millions in waste and fraud and unwarranted subsidies in Medicare." To identify this "waste and fraud," he proposes to establish a commission within the Executive Branch to investigate the program and initiate cuts. Congress will have only sharply limited power to override these reductions or else they will automatically take effect.

Obama admits that these cuts will largely take the form of reducing reimbursement rates for hospitals and doctors. Paid less per office visit, doctors will spend less time on each patient. Reimbursed less for MRIs or CT scans, they will order fewer of them. And getting less income, more doctors will retire and fewer will enter the profession, aggravating the scarcity.

The president also plans to eliminate the Medicare Advantage program, an approach to managed care that permits the elderly a coherence and a coordination in their treatment that about one-third of them find valuable enough to sign up for.

-- His newly established panel to cut Medicare will also "encourage the adoption of ... common sense best practices by doctors and medical professionals. ... Reducing the waste and inefficiency in Medicare and Medicaid will pay for most of this plan."

These are code words for the rationing the imbalance in supply and demand will cause. The panel will "encourage" doctors to adopt the "best practices" the panel recommends by limiting reimbursement rates or even banning alternatives. Likely guidelines will govern who can get elective surgery like hip replacements or new knees based on the number of QARYs "quality adjusted remaining years" the patient has.

For example, in Canada, the drug Avastin is barred by just such a panel despite its proven track record as the most effective anti-colon cancer drug on the market. The ban is not because of any safety concerns, but solely due to its $50,000 annual cost. As a direct result, 41 percent of Canadians with colon cancer die, as opposed to 32 percent of Americans. It is just these kinds of "best practices" that the panel will have to impose to pay for Obama's plan.

The panel will likely recommend limits on testing and screening, worsening rather than improving preventative care. In Canada, for example, there is an eight month wait for colonoscopies, which leads to a 25 percent higher incidence of colon cancer.

Together, these cuts in Medicare will pay for more than half of the subsidies in Obama's program. And what will the money be used for? To pay for medical coverage for people who are too young for Medicare, too wealthy for Medicaid and too old for the Children's Health Insurance Program.

The president claims that this coverage will be "affordable" for those now uninsured. But the guidelines in the bill indicate that a person making about $30,000 a year will have to pay approximately 8 percent of his income in premiums before the subsidies kick in -- $2,400 a year. Many of those now uninsured will find this expenditure both onerous and unnecessary in view of their current youth and good health.

Obama claims that "our health care problem is our deficit problem. Nothing else even comes close." He's wrong. Medicare and Medicaid costs have risen by about 5 percent in the past year, while the budget deficit has quadrupled. The deficit is caused by the massive overspending in the TARP program bailing out banks and the equally gargantuan stimulus package, throwing money -- ineffectually -- at the recession.

The president reports that "the reforms I'm proposing will not apply to those who are here illegally." This statement is also a half-truth. Illegal immigrants will be eligible to buy health insurance from the insurance exchange Obama creates, taking advantage of the lower rates he claims it will allow through bulk purchasing. And, without any effective provision for citizenship verification, will inevitably slip through the cracks and get subsidized coverage.

He boasts that "nothing in this plan will force you or your employer to change the coverage or the doctor you have." But the rationing his program will force will make those insurance companies and doctors impotent in the face of federal mandates for reduced care.

The president's plan is, essentially, a program to take medical care away from the elderly and give it to those who are not younger, healthier, and -- in the main -- richer.

========

To find out more about Dick Morris and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com. Distributed By Creators.Com

Copyright 2009 Dick Morris And Eileen Mcgann

This news arrived on: 09/16/2009
Share this Story
Digg   del.icio.us   Yahoo   Facebook   Google   

Printer Friendly Version | Send this page to a friend | Post Comment


Rate This Story:

Great - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Bad




Posted Comments:

09-23-2009 01:35
JCE wrote:



So how is Obamas plan flawed? Just how wrong is cutting waste and corruption, which is rampant? Morris, idiot that he is, does infer that we need to provide more medical staff. Well, by stopping all the waste and corruption, and stopping the need to have us all consume for profit, even if half the consumption is waste, and tackling the cost of education, we can provide more medical people. By tackling the lawyers, we can get tort reform. Obama is taking on the insurance companies. Morris defends them. We need to take on all the special interest groups, but we can't take them all at once. So where are all the people getting behind Obama as he tries to keep a promise? Health care is one of the best ones to start on, as it is crippling the country.



09-21-2009 23:19
Gerry wrote:

Rebuttal

Mr. Morris,

All right, we hear you, now you are on the spot. You have identified a prblem. Now, make a serious recommendation. At present the system is flawed. Obama's plan is flawed. Don't just find fault, propose an answer.



09-21-2009 12:04
Kathie wrote:

JCE

I totally agree with you about education. All of my children have degrees. The problem is, two of them are working through temp agencies right now, because their former employers both had to close their businesses due to the economy. One has health insurance through her husband, and the other one does not have health insurance at this time, because she is a single divorced mother, and can't afford to buy any. Thank goodness the children are insured through their father for now, but his job is iffy, too. And he makes components for government projects. As for affording an education, there is just as much waste in the education sector as there is anywhere else. Why does a textbook cost 2-3 hundred dollars? Why does the cost of housing rise every year, but the housing is still the same or worse? Why does the cost of classes rise when half of them are taught by video, without a teacher present to answer questions? Everyone has gotten greedy and lazy. An affordable. quality education would be a very welcome change.



09-21-2009 01:35
JCE wrote:



Kathie Excellent post. It is ironic that countries like Norway pay not only for the school that we pay for, but also universities. They have this idea that if the people are educated, they can be more productive members of society. They pay more tax on the average, but they get far more for those taxes. Of course, the rich don't get as much of the tax money. Somehow, the Norwegians seem to think that if the people are going to pay for something, not only should they get it, it should be good. I would like to see the government either pay or guarantee pay, and let the student pay a small percentage of their pay back into the system. That way, the student would get the education, and the country would benefit from the educated person. Our way is all about money and profit, not about the people, or what is best for them. Educated people would not allow the special interests to rule the people at such a cost to the people.



09-20-2009 23:29
Kathie wrote:

continued

I would be happy to pay $2400 per year for health insurance. My employer sponsered insurance cost $82 per week now, and I am not making $30,000 per year.

In conclusion, is your plan to not cut wasteful Medicare spending, and make sure the elderly get all of the bells and whistles, but don't insure the younger generation? I will not begrudge health care to the elderly, but I want my children and grandchildren to have the same opportunity for care.




Comment archive | Comment FAQ's

Post Comment::

Author:
Subject:



Recent archives Featured news

View Dick Morris ezine stories by date or visit the complete archive

Featured Channel: Politics

The ArcaMax Politics channel is one of 70 content categories offered by ArcaMax Publishing on this ...