Your email address is safe with us. View our Privacy policy.
Author Bio:
Pulitzer Prize winner Clarence Page began his career in journalism as editor for the Middletown Journal and Cincinnati Inquirer, and received his ...
Read more about By Clarence Page, Tribune Media Services.
Pulitzer Prize winner Clarence Page began his career in journalism as editor for the Middletown Journal and Cincinnati Inquirer, and received his ...
Read more about By Clarence Page, Tribune Media Services.
Chicago's Ambivalence of Hopes
By Clarence Page, Tribune Media Services
Ah, well. Let the games begin -- somewhere else!
Even President Barack Obama's magic has its limits, it turns out. The International Olympic Committee rejected Chicago's bid to host the Olympics, despite the president's quickie trip to make the pitch in person.
In the end, Chicago was the first to be eliminated -- in the first round of voting and with fewer votes than fellow finalists Tokyo, Madrid and the eventual winner, Rio de Janeiro.
Sometimes the magic works, sometimes it doesn't.
In fact, Obama and the rest of Chicago's powerhouse delegation, which included his wife, Michelle Obama, Mayor Richard M. Daley and his wife, Maggie Daley, and the powerhouse Queen of All Media, Oprah Winfrey, was fighting an uphill battle all along.
Expectations were overinflated by all the media hoopla surrounding historic trip, as media hoopla surrounds everything Obama does. But as the final bidding indicated, the insider club known as the IOC has minds of its own.
Speculation runs wild as to why Chicago lost. Most of it follows a lot of personal agendas. The negatives that various analysts and critics bring up -- crime, corruption and cronyism lead the pack -- are hardly unique to Chicago and are certainly no worse than the problems faced by Rio.
Rio took an edge in less tangible yet viscerally felt ways. Chicago's presentation to IOC, despite the Obama glitter, was lackluster and disorganized compared to the colorful and passionate presentation delivered by Rio.
Brazil reportedly played the geopolitical card skillfully, holding up maps that showed South America to be the only region left without a single Olympics. This apparently touched the hearts of the IOC, which likes to think of itself as a groundbreaking force for international development and unity.
And how unkind but savvy it was for Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva to use a certain Chicagoan's famous slogan when talking to reporters to promote his country's bid: "Yes we can!"
"For some countries, it is just one more sports event that they are going to organize," he said. "But for us, it is a unique and extraordinary thing."
That's more than you could say for a lot of folks back in Chicago, where a Chicago Tribune/WGN poll indicated that, either way the IOC decided, about half of the city would be happy or, at least, relieved. Only 47 percent of Chicagoans favored bringing the games here, according to the poll, while 45 percent opposed it.
That's a fair measure, in my humble view, of an intelligent Midwestern ambivalence, two warring attitudes deeply imbedded in the cultural DNA of Chicagoans when they are exposed to a deal that sounds almost too good to be true.
One of these attitudes is the boundless optimism captured in the ambitious slogan often attributed to the great Chicago architect/city planner Daniel Burnham: "Make no little plans."
Burnham brought the world such wonders as the World's Columbian Exposition of 1893. His grand vision is constrained in today's Chicagoan only by a healthy skepticism, as expressed in the late Chicago City News Bureau's slogan: "If your mother says she loves you, check it out."
Visions of Chicago's great past triumphs danced in the heads of local folks. But, with one former Illinois governor in jail and another famously under indictment, so did the possibility of a grand, overpriced boondoggle with powerful elites stuffing their pockets and regular taxpayers left to foot the bill.
Political rivals of Obama and Daley stop at nothing to wage a partisan attack -- and in some cases boost TV ratings -- by smearing Obama's efforts to bring the Olympics to the United States.
And that's too bad. Los Angeles showed in 1984 that an Olympics can make a profit, if it's done right. It can create jobs, boost commerce and build civic pride and national unity. But that requires a sense of shared purpose that Chicago and our national politics aren't very good at pulling together these days.
Instead, Obama and his hometown's leaders hear calls to scale things back. Don't take on so much. Make only small plans. Little plans "have no magic to stir men's blood," said Burnham, "and probably will not themselves be realized." Burnham had a point, but small plans seem to be all that a lot of Americans want to tackle these days.
Someday, my Midwestern optimism tells me, the Chicago and the America that Burnham knew will be back. Until then, let the Games begin in a place that appreciates big ideas: Brazil.
========
E-mail Clarence Page at cpage(at)tribune.com, or write to him c/o Tribune Media Services, 2225 Kenmore Ave., Suite 114, Buffalo, NY 14207.
(c) 2008 CLARENCE PAGE DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
This news arrived on: 10/04/2009
Printer Friendly Version | Send this page to a friend | Post Comment
Rate This Story:
Great - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Bad
Posted Comments:
10-08-2009 01:33
JCE wrote:
Redneck
You will be a democrat long before I even consider it. Republican or democrat, never have, never will. Love my country too much.
10-06-2009 23:25
JCE wrote:
Redneck
Perhaps when you stop lying and calling me a democrat just because you hate them, and you know that I know the only thing worse than a democrat is a republican, then, and only maybe, there is hope for you. I don't think there is hope for the other republicans, and the blue dogs and democrats act just like you. Lie, insult, and never deal with the issues. If I had to be either party, I still wouldn't be either party. I apologize for neither. I can't help it if Bush is our worst president. That is really bad when you look at the mug shots of the other 40 some crooks and traitors before him. Clinton was a lot of things, but not a Klan member. Do you disrespect all people, and all presidents, or just the democrats?
old cowboy In the military, if you do something that the brass doesn't like, and you get away with it, you can be a hero. If not, you will pay. Obama got away with it. The republicans will find fault no matter what he does. But then, if Jesus came back, and told it like he did back in the day, they would find fault with him. So they only count when they vote or lie, not when they talk bad about people.
old cowboy In the military, if you do something that the brass doesn't like, and you get away with it, you can be a hero. If not, you will pay. Obama got away with it. The republicans will find fault no matter what he does. But then, if Jesus came back, and told it like he did back in the day, they would find fault with him. So they only count when they vote or lie, not when they talk bad about people.
10-06-2009 01:53
Redneck is here! wrote:
apologize ????
JCE, I agree! You democrats should still be apologizing for Carter and Klinton! That should take at least 100 years! Maybe you should begin by apologizing for Obama Now? The destruction of our economy started when the demos got control of congress! Remember we got to see Pelosi's leering face every day! Since then!
10-05-2009 23:42
old cowboy wrote:
losing situation
I feel the President made a bad decision to go to the Olympic bidding war. If Chicago had won the Right Wingers would have some way tied it to Acorn and paying off the Chicago Machine and as we have seen since they didn't get it the same Righties are saying he is weak and a loser.
10-05-2009 22:07
JCE wrote:
Olympic Attemder I suppose it never dawned on you that after the Bush regime, there has been a lot to apologize for. Especially to the American people themselves. What Bush did to the economy, and his invasions that made us so much unsafer, killed so many people especially Americans, and made us so unpopular, especially the war crimes, shouldn't be defended like you do. The first step to getting back on the right track, is to admit we are doing wrong, and then stopping, and then fixing it. So what part of that 3 step remedy are you against?
Marty B Well said.
John W Smith III Right you are.
AnneB-Illinois While I have to agree with you about Chicago, I can't in all consciousness buy into your hatred of the Obamas. You hear what you want to hear. I heard the words, and it wasn't as you want to believe.
Marty B Well said.
John W Smith III Right you are.
AnneB-Illinois While I have to agree with you about Chicago, I can't in all consciousness buy into your hatred of the Obamas. You hear what you want to hear. I heard the words, and it wasn't as you want to believe.
Comment archive | Comment FAQ's
![]() |
![]() |
View Clarence Page ezine stories by date or visit the complete archive |
Featured Channel: Politics
The ArcaMax Politics channel is one of 70 content categories offered by ArcaMax Publishing on this ... |











VideoSquares.com