Your email address is safe with us. View our Privacy policy.
Author Bio:
Richard Cohen's columns have appeared on the op-ed page of The Washington Post since 1984. He joined The Post in 1968 after attending the Columbia ...
Read more about Richard Cohen.
Richard Cohen's columns have appeared on the op-ed page of The Washington Post since 1984. He joined The Post in 1968 after attending the Columbia ...
Read more about Richard Cohen.
Biden is Always a Candidate and a Gentleman
Richard Cohen
I saw another man dance with Joe Biden's wife, Jill. It was almost
three years ago, on the terrace of the sublime Villa d'Este on the
shore of Italy's stunning Lake Como, and Biden watched, smiling
broadly and sometimes laughing, as the man gracefully moved Jill
around the dance floor. It was late, and the guests still there looked
on keenly because Jill Biden's dancing partner was very good-looking
and very famous. He was John McCain.
I tell this story to suggest that if anyone -- including, of course, Barack Obama -- thinks that Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. is going to play the usual role given to a vice presidential candidate, hatchet man, then the wrong man has been chosen. Biden is capable of the occasional gaffe, the sentence without end, the piquant but (literally) politically incorrect statement such as the one he made during the primary campaign -- Obama is "not yet ready" to be president -- but he has the essential decency that once was commonplace in Washington and now, alas, is taken for weakness and lack of proper fervor. Joe Biden is a gentleman.
In choosing Biden, Obama reached into the very heart of the Washington establishment -- especially its foreign policy wing. In his many years on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, both as a member and as chairman, Biden has come to know just about all the players. He has been at it so long -- elected senator at the ridiculous age of 29 -- that then-Capt. John McCain (U.S. Navy) was his military aide on some foreign trips. I applaud the choice of Biden, but the one thing he does not represent is change.
In fact, Biden represents the foreign policy consensus that Obama, and especially his followers, opposed -- and in the latter case, abhorred. Biden voted for the Iraq War. He based his position on the received wisdom of that time -- Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and needed to be taken out. Biden later recanted, said he made a mistake. But his mistake, he had to add, was predicated on the assumption that President Bush would not rush to war. That was his second mistake.
Yet if Biden was wrong on Iraq, he has been right on so much else -- including that military force had to be used in the former Yugoslavia to end ethnic cleansing. He has been right, too, about the dangers of nuclear proliferation -- a dull topic of merely life-or-death importance. Over the years, he has been loyal -- to his party and to his president, even when that president was as irresponsible as Bill Clinton.
Biden's selection represents an implied admission by Obama that he lacks what Biden has: foreign policy credentials. In that sense, the Delaware senator does not make the ticket whole. Instead, he calls attention to what it lacks.
A vice president's only meaningful constitutional obligation is to succeed the president in the event of death or incapacitation. Biden can do that. But his foreign policy experience is almost beside the point. A president has an entire staff dedicated to national security and a national security adviser who, depending on the president, can have more power than the secretary of state.
No, Biden was chosen because, in the end, he satisfied Obama's apparent desire, if not need, to reassure those who wonder about his youth, his race, his manner, his peripatetic childhood: I'm safe. I'm prudent. I'm thoughtful. I was president of the Harvard Law Review, for crying out loud. On the stump, Obama did not need someone like himself. He felt the need for someone more rooted.
For Obama, the risk in choosing Biden is that he will, sooner or later, throw this highly disciplined campaign off-message. Biden has substituted loquaciousness for the conventional and more colorful weaknesses of politicians. To quote something I once wrote, his mouth is his Achilles' heel.
In response to that column, Biden called and left a message. He thanked me for the column ... he needed to be told the truth ... it was good for him ... hard to hear, but in the end the sort of thing he needed to know ... of course, he had his reasons for going on so long -- this was during the confirmation hearing for Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito -- since he had things to say ... points to make ... but yes, I was right, and he went on too long and he had to do something about that and it was good of me to point it out. Beep! The machine cut him off.
Gotta love someone like that.
========
Richard Cohen's e-mail address is cohenr@washpost.com
(c) 2008, Washington Post Writers Group
This news arrived on: 08/25/2008
Printer Friendly Version | Send this page to a friend | Post Comment
Rate This Story:
Great - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Bad
Posted Comments:
08-28-2008 11:32
Walt wrote:
Get the facts
If you really want to get the truth read "The Bush Agenda" by Antonia Juhasz. All of the facts in her book are backed up by proof and not by some writer's opinion. Now you will get it straight.
08-27-2008 23:55
Sunshine49 wrote:
Ken from Oregon
Added note:
All the areas where the oil companies have permits to drill are the areas WITHOUT oil. That's why they don't drill there. Why spend the money if they won't hit enough oil to break even.
All the areas where the oil companies have permits to drill are the areas WITHOUT oil. That's why they don't drill there. Why spend the money if they won't hit enough oil to break even.
08-27-2008 23:46
Sunshine49 wrote:
Ken from Oregon
Good post!
The Democrats took over two years ago and things went downhill from there. I know the reason that the politicians aren't going after the oil. You may not believe this, but I'll try to explain.
Since the 1970s, when the EPA was started, they have put almost half of the U.S. under their protection. All the areas covered by the EPA are the areas that have the oil, natural gas and other minerals that are worth anything. The purpose for this is so that Congress can use those mineral rights as collateral for the loans they have made from other countries. If we start to drill in those areas, the countries we owe money to will call in their loans as a default of the agreement. The whole Drill, Drill, Drill bit is nothing more than a charade to appease the public for a little longer until the economy collapses and Washington declares Martial Law because of all the looting and rioting that will happen. Under Martial Law, the government can claim all land and business as under their control. Good-bye freedom and good-bye to the Republic of the United States. The politicians will "rule" and the rest of us will be turned into slaves like it was in Russia, Germany and Cuba.
This plan has been many years in the making and part of the plan was NOT to teach the American public the truth about their Constitutional rights that the unconstitutional Central government has taken from the "people"
End of story!
The Democrats took over two years ago and things went downhill from there. I know the reason that the politicians aren't going after the oil. You may not believe this, but I'll try to explain.
Since the 1970s, when the EPA was started, they have put almost half of the U.S. under their protection. All the areas covered by the EPA are the areas that have the oil, natural gas and other minerals that are worth anything. The purpose for this is so that Congress can use those mineral rights as collateral for the loans they have made from other countries. If we start to drill in those areas, the countries we owe money to will call in their loans as a default of the agreement. The whole Drill, Drill, Drill bit is nothing more than a charade to appease the public for a little longer until the economy collapses and Washington declares Martial Law because of all the looting and rioting that will happen. Under Martial Law, the government can claim all land and business as under their control. Good-bye freedom and good-bye to the Republic of the United States. The politicians will "rule" and the rest of us will be turned into slaves like it was in Russia, Germany and Cuba.
This plan has been many years in the making and part of the plan was NOT to teach the American public the truth about their Constitutional rights that the unconstitutional Central government has taken from the "people"
End of story!
08-27-2008 23:46
sassy wrote:
bad speller
Joe it's not bad spelling that I have trouble with.My hands are sore so it takes me time and when I do a wrong letter I let it go.Besides I don't care if Bidens name is spelled With an M on the end for he is just a patssy for Obama.
08-27-2008 23:15
Sunshine49 wrote:
Sassy
It doesn't matter that Sassy isn't good at spelling. She, at least has enough guts to speak out with what she feels. Too many people are afraid to say anything because they want to be "politically correct" and not make any waves. Good thing our Founding Fathers didn't feel that way or there wouldn't be a Republic of the United States!
Comment archive | Comment FAQ's
 |
 |
|
View Richard Cohen ezine stories by date or visit the complete archive |
The ArcaMax Politics channel is one of 70 content categories offered by ArcaMax Publishing on this ... |
ArcaMax Dating
