Your email address is safe with us. View our Privacy policy.
Ethical rules for incidental data released
The experts define an "incidental finding" as potentially important information about a research participant but beyond the aims of the study. The scientists say IFs are becoming increasingly common, yet no consensus has emerged to guide decisions about informing research participants of those findings.
University of Minnesota Professor Susan Wolf led a two-year project, funded by the National Human Genome Research Institute, that involved a multidisciplinary group of leading experts. That research resulted in the publication of a 17-article symposium, including a consensus paper with ethical guidelines.
The guidelines recommend disclosing IFs about conditions likely to be life-threatening. However, the guidelines recommend researchers not disclose IFs that are unlikely to benefit the participant or whose net benefit cannot be determined, reasoning such disclosures are likely to be more burdensome than beneficial to participants.
"Handling IFs responsibly requires clarity about the difference between research and clinical care," Wolf said.
The consensus paper appears in the Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.
Copyright 2008 by United Press International.
This news arrived on: 07/02/2008
Printer Friendly Version | Send this page to a friend | Post Comment
Rate This Story:
Great - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Bad
Posted Comments:
07-03-2008 19:05
normajun wrote:
ifs, in research studies
All I know, with experiments, is one must be sure of what they're proving, as true and possible!No ifs or buts.That is why we have brains...Grey matter, that is!
Comment archive | Comment FAQ's
 |
 |
View Religion & Spirituality ezine stories by date or visit the complete archive |
The ArcaMax Politics channel is one of 70 content categories offered by ArcaMax Publishing on this ... |
Body Mass
