Your email address is safe with us. View our Privacy policy.
Author Bio:
Kathleen Parker is one of America's most popular opinion columnists, addressing the country's mental health through her views on current national ...
Read more about Kathleen Parker.
Kathleen Parker is one of America's most popular opinion columnists, addressing the country's mental health through her views on current national ...
Read more about Kathleen Parker.
Courage Under Fire
Kathleen Parker
WASHINGTON -- Being shot down may not qualify one to be president, as
retired Gen. Wesley Clark infamously said recently. But what men do
under fire might tell us about the character we may discover in a
president.
Clark's precise words, aimed at undermining John McCain's executive experience, were: "I don't think getting in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to become president." In fairness, Clark also praised McCain's heroism, saying that he honored his service as a prisoner of war and even that "he was a hero to me."
Predictably, Republicans were outraged and Democrats were outraged at the GOP's outrage. For his part, Barack Obama performed the political minuet of condemn 'n' distance. He condemned the remarks and distanced himself from his surrogate/general.
McCain made a few tepid remarks, but mostly let others put Clark in his place. And, though McCain is clearly content to use the iconic image of his younger pilot self for campaign purposes, he also has shrugged off his heroism.
"It doesn't take a great deal of effort to get shot down," McCain himself is fond of saying.
As the news cycle churns, Clark's comment was yesterday's chum. It was in poor taste, yes, but it wasn't the first time he had expressed similar thoughts. National Review's Byron York blogged in March that Clark viewed McCain's combat experience as inferior to Hillary Clinton's qualifications for office.
"If you look at what Hillary Clinton has done during her time as the first lady of the United States, her travel to 80 countries, her representing the U.S. abroad, plus her years in the Senate, I think she's the most experienced and capable person in the race," York quotes Clark as saying.
Ahem. Well. So much for that. Now that Clark is a military adviser to Obama, he apparently is still skeptical about McCain's qualifications.
Let's concede that surviving torture doesn't necessarily endow one with presidential mettle. And, fine, being shot down doesn't qualify one to direct the executive branch.
But Clark misses the point of McCain's story.
McCain isn't a hero because he was tortured. He's a hero because he declined an offer by his captors to be released, refusing to leave his fellow Americans behind.
It may not take much effort to get shot down, but it must take a considerable act of will to consign oneself to more deprivation and torture. It must take a level of courage unknown to most to place concern for others above one's own interest.
Surely self-sacrifice, courage and loyalty figure somewhere in the calculus for selecting a president.
We can make no similar analysis of Obama, since he hasn't fought in any wars in his lifetime. But we have been given a glimpse at how Obama responds to external pressures and where he draws the line on loyalty and self-sacrifice. When it comes to family and friends, it seems Obama is first a survivalist.
A few months ago, when the Rev. Jeremiah Wright first came to national attention, Obama was nearly demure when he said: "I can no more disown (Wright) than I can disown my white grandmother."
He may not have disowned his white grandmother, but Obama didn't exactly paint a sympathetic -- or loving -- portrait of her either. He essentially threw her under the bus, saying that she had made racist remarks while he was growing up, a statement that served only to highlight Obama's own remarkable transcendence.
After several weeks of balancing his professed love for Wright with the controversial statements of his chosen father figure and spiritual mentor, Obama eventually left his church of 20 years. But why then, after all those years, did Obama finally find the door?
What changed was the degree of his self-interest. As long as Wright was helping Obama burnish his bona fides within the African-American community, it didn't matter that the minister's rhetorical flights of fancy bordered on paranoid, racist delusion. Only when Wright became a potential obstacle to Obama's ambition -- by saying that Obama was simply behaving as a politician -- did Obama show Wright the underside of that very busy bus.
Clark is right that getting shot down doesn't qualify one to be commander in chief. But it is relevant to wonder with whom one would rather share a foxhole.
========
Kathleen Parker's e-mail address is kparker@kparker.com
(c) 2008, Washington Post Writers Group
This news arrived on: 07/02/2008
Printer Friendly Version | Send this page to a friend | Post Comment
Rate This Story:
Great - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Bad
Posted Comments:
07-08-2008 23:57
Kathie Hamm wrote:
who should have to explain
Darlene,
I personally don't think that this election is, nor should it ever be set as a platform for Bush to have to explain the record of his administration. I agree with Edward on several points, but most of all is the one where he said that Obams is a wimp, because that is exactly what he is. I for one wouldn't now or ever use him as an attorney for anything. And, likewise, I will not now or ever vote for him!
Yes, maybe Bush has vetoed bills that included monetary supplements aimed at war veterans, however, the wonderful Democratic leaders in Congress who refused to work with him on any legislation, only have themselves to blame for that.
I, personally, will be so glad when this whole election business is over with so I don't have to listen to or read about it everytime I turn around.
One thing we can count on ....if Obama wins, we will see gas prices soar even higher than they already are now and you can bet your boots that taxes will be twice what they are now. Won't that be a fine How Do You Do? But I can guarnatee that there won't be any negative press about it either because our extremely liberal media press will be sure to see to that. They all make me sick! There isn't an unbiased bone in their bodies.
I personally don't think that this election is, nor should it ever be set as a platform for Bush to have to explain the record of his administration. I agree with Edward on several points, but most of all is the one where he said that Obams is a wimp, because that is exactly what he is. I for one wouldn't now or ever use him as an attorney for anything. And, likewise, I will not now or ever vote for him!
Yes, maybe Bush has vetoed bills that included monetary supplements aimed at war veterans, however, the wonderful Democratic leaders in Congress who refused to work with him on any legislation, only have themselves to blame for that.
I, personally, will be so glad when this whole election business is over with so I don't have to listen to or read about it everytime I turn around.
One thing we can count on ....if Obama wins, we will see gas prices soar even higher than they already are now and you can bet your boots that taxes will be twice what they are now. Won't that be a fine How Do You Do? But I can guarnatee that there won't be any negative press about it either because our extremely liberal media press will be sure to see to that. They all make me sick! There isn't an unbiased bone in their bodies.
07-08-2008 20:34
Dung wrote:
courage under fire
If Clinton had not closed all the military bases, to balance the budget, we would be prepared to handle world problems that come up...
07-08-2008 20:19
Edward Ernspiker wrote:
Darlene
Obama's a wimp who has not served in the military or even volunteered. Typical ACLU laywer. He wants to be President? What gall. His and the democrats no drilling for oil is stupid. They would rather have $4+ dollar gas than build refineries, drill for more oil here. Pushing global warming that no one believes in to raise TAXES, pie in the sky cars that no one can afford, or would not want. Obama's YES WE CAN, bankrup America plan. Darlene, I bet you have never raised a finger to help anyone but yourself, let alone served your country. He makes millions, while I have an income of $1491.00. He ought to try buying gas on that income. I have had to stop going to doctors because I do not have the money for gas. I just got out of the hospital Sunday for congestive heart failure. YES WE CAN bankrup America.
07-08-2008 13:43
Obama wrote:
Clark
Why do we continue to give press to Wesley Clark and his inane opinions?
07-08-2008 12:48
Nancy wrote:
Courage under fire..
Shame on you Wesley Clark...In order to keep our freedon, we have to have a military. I'm an Independent, and I know we need men like McCain in our military. There are good men dying for our country, as we speak. I wonder how those against war would explain to the families of those who gave their life, it was needless. If Clinton had not closed all the military bases, to balance the budget, we would be prepared to handle world problems that come up. As it stands, our soldiers, are overworked, underpaid, and not given the medical care our congress gets...
Comment archive | Comment FAQ's
 |
 |
|
View Kathleen Parker ezine stories by date or visit the complete archive |
The ArcaMax Politics channel is one of 70 content categories offered by ArcaMax Publishing on this ... |
Body Mass
