Your email address is safe with us. View our Privacy policy.
Author Bio:
Pulitzer Prize winner Clarence Page began his career in journalism as editor for the Middletown Journal and Cincinnati Inquirer, and received his ...
Read more about By Clarence Page, Tribune Media Services.
Pulitzer Prize winner Clarence Page began his career in journalism as editor for the Middletown Journal and Cincinnati Inquirer, and received his ...
Read more about By Clarence Page, Tribune Media Services.
Pursuing The Elusive White Voter
By Clarence Page, Tribune Media Services
Oh, no, she didn't. Or, as the young hip-hop generation might say,
"Oh, no, she did-int!"
But, oh, yes, she d-id. A day after her hoped-for monster triumph in the Indiana and North Carolina primaries fizzled, Sen. Hillary Clinton no longer seemed to care whom she offended. She dared to speak about race and gender in public with the candid language that even political consultants usually keep private.
Despite losing big to Sen. Barack Obama in North Carolina's Democratic primary and barely squeaking out a victory in Indiana, she said in an interview with USA Today that "I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on."
And who might that "broader base" be? She cited an Associated Press story "that found how Sen. Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me."
"There's a pattern emerging here," she said. Yes, there is a pattern here and it's not a very pretty one. When Clinton is sounding like Ms. Cranky, implying out loud that her opponent's supporters are not hard-working enough, white enough or undereducated enough, it's hardly a high point in her campaign.
But the former First Lady rejected the notion that her comments were racially divisive. "These are the people you have to win if you're a Democrat in sufficient numbers to actually win the election," she said. "Everybody knows that."
She has a point. Exit polls in Indiana and North Carolina showed her beating Obama among white voters, particularly white men, and voters who lack college degrees.
She won about 60 percent of the white vote in both states, down from the 65 percent of the white vote she won in the Ohio primary on March 4 and the 63 percent she received in Pennsylvania on April 22 .
Black voters, by contrast, turned out nine-to-one for Obama in Indiana and North Carolina, which is close to the black turnout for Democratic presidential candidates in recent decades. Some white bloggers see some veiled form of black supremacy in that turnout. They might have a case among those who choose not to remember how hard Obama had to work to woo black voters away from Clinton before his South Carolina primary victory.
Remember those days when everyone seemed to be asking whether Obama was "black enough" to win black votes? Now Clinton is questioning whether he is too "elitist" to win the votes of "hard-working people." That's the message of her a Charleston, W. Va., speech a day after her newspaper interview: "We need to bring back hardworking people to the Democratic Party. I'm winning Catholic voters and Hispanic voters, blue-collar workers and seniors. People Sen. McCain will need in the general election."
She's right to observe that Obama has a challenge ahead in winning white swing voters, if he wins the nomination. But so does she, considering how despised she has been among conservatives over the years. Taking advice from Hillary Clinton on winning white males in light of that history sounds about as wise as taking child care advice from Britney Spears.
Yet, as her relentless pursuit of the Democratic nomination has shown, she's a fighter. Her recent populist pitch to "hard-working people" ("Some call you swing voters. I call you Americans," she said in Charleston) is an appeal not so much to color as to culture.
The great unspoken question in every voter's mind is whether a candidate is on their side, understands their values and connects with the way they see the world. That big question turns Obama's biggest asset, his being fresh and new, into a liability when it causes people to question how well they know him -- and how well he knows them.
Those doubts were enhanced when incendiary sound bites from his former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, brought Obama's approval ratings down to those of mortal people. His impressive showing in Indiana and North Carolina appears to have put concerns about Wright to rest for now, although they are certain to come back in attack ads in the fall if Obama is nominated. That will be a very different campaign from the one Obama and Clinton have waged so far.
With that in mind, the most important moment for Democratic fortunes won't be the selection of their nominee, but in soothing the anger and disappointment of the side that loses. Once the party's leaders bring themselves back together, they'll have to reach out and unify the folks who really count -- the voters -- regardless of race, color, gender or how "hard-working" they appear to be.
========
E-mail Clarence Page at cpage(at)tribune.com, or write to him c/o Tribune Media Services, 2225 Kenmore Ave., Suite 114, Buffalo, NY 14207.
(c) 2008 CLARENCE PAGE DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
This news arrived on: 05/11/2008
Printer Friendly Version | Send this page to a friend | Post Comment
Rate This Story:
Great - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Bad
Posted Comments:
05-12-2008 14:58
Ann wrote:
Who Played the Race Card?
How did Senator Obama's campaign woo the black vote away from Senator Clinton? It was all in the memo that came from his campaign right before the South Carolina primary. Chris Matthews had a copy in his hand at one of the debates and asked Obama about it and never pursued his vague answer. The campaign set out to find any little thing the Clintons or their surrogates said that they could "maybe" twist or insinuate as being racist and bring that to the media's attention and play it up to the fullest in order to incense African Americans. This would cause them to have a good reason to abandon the Clintons and vote for Obama, which they really wanted to do anyway, but kind of felt a loyalty to Bill Clinton. David Axelrod knew it would take something drastic like this - a racist thing - to get that to happen - and viola! guess what!
Who played the race card to perfection and who got played? It was brilliant!
Who played the race card to perfection and who got played? It was brilliant!
05-11-2008 22:47
sassy wrote:
Hillary VS Obama
You may see a woman we see a leader. We only see a trater to the true blood Americans when Obama speeks. Obama new about the rev. Wright speech being on Utube long before he said a word agenst it. The man must have beleaved inwhat he had lissaned to for 20 years or he would have said somthing before the news did. If you don't beleave in Hillary don't give your vote in the genral election a do nothing Obama before you go to Ralph Naders web site. Obama can't beat McCane But Hillaey can.
05-11-2008 19:45
wrote:
do not be mislead by the fact the she is a woman . she is a great leader . she will make a wonderful predsient . they talk against her because of bill actions and then they say she shouldnt have stood by her husband if she had not they would be screaming another story . i think she can and will be an good leader . at least she understands the common person .
05-11-2008 15:41
Cassonya wrote:
Obama
Obama doesn't use the race card that he has. Obama isn't Black. He had a Black father but he was raised white. He should appeal to both segments of the population, black & white as he is both.
Wait and see; he will be our next president.
Wait and see; he will be our next president.
05-11-2008 13:06
Anna Stanley wrote:
Pursuing the Elusive White Voter
I am not sure what the problem is with Senator Clinton;s analysis is about the Democratic Party needing to appeal to working class whites--this is a fact she simply stated. Yet at the same time in your article you celebrate the fact that Obama has garnered large sections of the Black vote and that seems to be okay--that many of the are simply voting on race. What is the difference?
Comment archive | Comment FAQ's
![]() |
![]() |
View Clarence Page ezine stories by date or visit the complete archive |
Featured Channel: Politics
The ArcaMax Politics channel is one of 70 content categories offered by ArcaMax Publishing on this ... |












ArcaMax Dating