Your email address is safe with us. View our Privacy policy.
Author Bio:
Arianna Huffington, formerly a Republican, credits her shift in political views to colleagues Al Franken and Robert Scheer. Before her change in ...
Read more about By Arianna Huffington, Tribune Media Services.
Arianna Huffington, formerly a Republican, credits her shift in political views to colleagues Al Franken and Robert Scheer. Before her change in ...
Read more about By Arianna Huffington, Tribune Media Services.
The Bailout Plan: Welcome To Economic Shock And Awe
By Arianna Huffington, Tribune Media Services
See if this sounds familiar:
There is a gathering threat to the safety of the United States. We must take immediate action. Congress must quickly grant the president and the secretary what they want and also give them full and unfettered authority to execute the plan.
Welcome to Economic Shock and Awe (or as some have dubbed it, according to Paul Krugman, "the Authorization for Use of Financial Force").
Even the amount of taxpayer money being bandied about -- $1 trillion -- is similar. Think you got your money's worth for the Iraq war? Congratulations -- you're about to buy another pricey debacle.
We've seen how negligent the Bush administration is with our money -- flushing billions on wasteful, mismanaged Iraq reconstruction and Katrina recovery projects.
Now the same folks who brought us those no-bid, profit-guaranteed, crony-friendly, war-and-disaster-profiteering boondoggles want us to hand them control of a $700 billion Wall Street slush fund -- with no strings attached. How dumb -- or frightened -- do they think we are?
This is, as Matt Yglesias calls it, "a crisis point for American liberalism." The battle lines are already clear: Paulson and Bush and the Republican Party want a license to reward the worst actors in the financial industry and do nothing for American families suffering the consequences.
Remember a few years ago when lawmaker after lawmaker -- mostly Democrats, but a few Republicans -- said of Iraq, "If I'd known then what I know now, I'd have voted differently."
Well, this time at least some lawmakers -- mostly Democrats, but a few Republicans -- are not being so easily bamboozled. Congressional Democrats, led by Chris Dodd in the Senate and Barney Frank in the House, have put forth proposals doing away with Paulson's demand for unprecedented authoritarian power and adding a requirement that the government do more to help troubled borrowers refinance their mortgages.
The Treasury appears willing to bend on those elements, but sticking points remain, including efforts to limit the pay of executives and Dodd's proposal that taxpayers get a share of the profits if the bad debt being bought rises in value.
Let's hope Democratic resolve holds up against the inevitable charges by the Bush administration that demands for oversight, limits on executive compensation, profit sharing for taxpayers, and aid for struggling homeowners will lead to an economic Armageddon.
There is no question that the need to address this crisis is urgent and that the issues involved are complex. But urgency and complexity cannot be allowed to become excuses for lawmakers, the media, and the public to throw up their hands and allow themselves to be bull-rushed into disastrous public policy.
Over the past 30 years, Americans have been bombarded with sermons evangelizing for the free market religion of the right, and the supposed correlation between unregulated markets and progress. In the process, the American people have been demoted from citizens to consumers, and sold a bill of goods (rather than a Bill of Rights) about how the almighty market was the essential foundation of democracy.
In the course of selling us on buying, the market-worshippers shredded the modern social contract, the hard-fought consensus that had emerged since the New Deal, which ordered our political priorities, and expressed both our communal concern for the most vulnerable members of society and our disapproval of huge inequalities. We were now supposed to believe that all could be left up to the soulless, self-correcting calculus of supply and demand. Government involvement was an anachronism, regulatory oversight an impediment.
The last few weeks have demolished that notion. In the battle over the proper role of government, the forces of the right, the high priests of the church of the Free Market -- including Bush, Paulson, and the Masters of Wall Street -- have suffered a monumental defeat. So why are we allowing them to dictate the terms of their surrender?
========
Arianna Huffington's e-mail address is arianna@huffingtonpost.com.
(c) 2008 Arianna Huffington. Distributed by Tribune Media Services, Inc.
This news arrived on: 09/25/2008
Printer Friendly Version | Send this page to a friend | Post Comment
Rate This Story:
Great - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Bad
Posted Comments:
11-15-2008 01:16
JCE wrote:
In any trade agreement, there should first be a balance, and any goods produced in a foreign country by an American company should be treated as both, taxed heavily, yet part of that countrys goods coming into this country. We can tighten our belts, do without a bit, till we begin producing here. let the world solve its own problems, and lets solve our. Keep it simple, especially legislation, and forget partisanship, all we have time for is cooperation and hard work. Let the rich fend for themselves, help restore the middle class, give them and the poor a fair, fighting chance, and we'll be fine.
11-15-2008 01:11
JCE wrote:
They voted for a bail out fine, then lets bail out the citizens. Guarantee pensions, retirements, make loans for mortgages so people keep their homes, pay severance pay for workers, none for top executives, unemployment benefits, and investigate and prosecute all who benefited so much. The market will take care of itself. Let them declare bankruptcy, and let the stockholders and execs just deal with it. If the company is needed, it will restructure and continue. Put the money in green jobs and infrastructure, and American manufacturing. Tax the heck out of any company who has gone overseas, and at least treat their products as imports, and heavily tax them.
10-02-2008 03:08
ed wrote:
The only reason I read this woman's articles is I want to see how many ways she can twist the truth to benefit her point of view regardless of fact.
09-28-2008 11:41
CDS wrote:
sunshine49
No you just answered your own question, what you hear from your sources you believe and think it is all true.You are uninformed.
09-28-2008 01:21
Sunshine49 wrote:
To CDS
I guess if I said that it was all the Republicans fault -- then you would say it was all truth! NO Democrat would do such a thing to the American people. RIGHT! What a joke! You are very uninformed!
Comment archive | Comment FAQ's
 |
 |
View Arianna Huffington ezine stories by date or visit the complete archive |
The ArcaMax Politics channel is one of 70 content categories offered by ArcaMax Publishing on this ... |
Body Mass
