Your email address is safe with us. View our Privacy policy.
Author Bio:
Political journalist Alexander Cockburn (pronounced CO-burn) began his career at the University of Oxford, working as a reporter and commentator in...
Read more about Alexander Cockburn.
Political journalist Alexander Cockburn (pronounced CO-burn) began his career at the University of Oxford, working as a reporter and commentator in...
Read more about Alexander Cockburn.
It's All About Paying Workers Less
Alexander Cockburn
Since there's one standard for automakers and another for bankers, the
quickest way for GM to pick up some loose change would be to buy a few
banks and thus get the company's mitts on some of the Treasury's $700
billion. If insurance companies are doing it, why not GM?
A story on the Bloomberg wire on Nov. 17 told us that four of the world's biggest insurers, including Transamerica and Hartford Financial Services Group, may buy some ailing savings and loans in trouble with the Office of Thrift Supervision for making shifty loans. That way, the insurance giants can join the excited line at the back door of the Treasury's Troubled Asset Relief Program and dip into the moolah. "Hartford's $10 million acquisition of Sanford, Florida-based Federal Trust Corp.," Bloomberg's reporters wrote, "may entitle it to $3.4 billion of U.S. capital. Lincoln National in Philadelphia may win access to $3 billion by taking over Newton County Loan & Savings, which has three full-time employees and $7.3 million of assets."
Whenever the issue is one of giving money to big industrial corporations employing real, live workers, particularly workers in labor unions, the Commentariat hauls up the Double Standard and nails it to the top mast, next to the Jolly Roger.
Last Sunday, I had the usual urge to machine-gun the TV set while listening to the McLaughlin Group, all of whom presumably haul home at least $200,000 a year, as they deplored the unconscionable wages of line workers in Detroit. The same urge flares up when reading the Wall Street Journal's editorial page. As a matter of economic principle, the WSJ's editors have always taken a stern line about letting the weak die in the snow.
When it came to prostrate bankers, the Angel of Mercy descended from heaven and took up residence in the WSJ's editorial suite. On Sept. 27, an editorial approved of the $700 billion banker bailout. Then came GM's crisis. On Nov. 10, the Angel of Mercy quit the Journal's editorial page abruptly: "We hope Messrs. Bush and Paulson just say no. The Tarp was intended to save the financial system from collapse, not to be a honey pot for any industry running short of cash."
You see, shoveling money at Goldman Sachs and the other titans of Wall Street constitutes systemic rescue of the billionaires vital to national well-being and self-esteem. Stabilizing the remaining core of America's industrial base, particularly a core infested by people with union cards, is quite another matter.
Of course, the target of the WSJ and of the Republicans and DLC Democrats in Congress is organized labor. The WSJ again: "The very success of this U.S. auto industry indicates that highly skilled American workers can profitably churn out cars without being organized by the UAW." The aim is to use the current crisis of GM -- a company that in world terms is doing reasonably well -- to help it renege yet again on its health obligations to its workers, active and retired, and cheapen the cost of domestic industrial labor.
Auto-parts factories haven't all been shipped to China. In fact, they are flourishing in the Midwest. It's just that they aren't union shops, aren't as dominated by the white and black working class. Rather, they are nonunion, usually antiunion, sweatshop-type factories with few benefits and an increasingly Latino and undocumented workforce. These shops have been springing up and expanding over the past few years, but the workers have had virtually zero bargaining power. Remember also, being mindful of the Nov. 4 benchmark in America's history, that those auto plants really are the last stand for the black industrial working class.
If America loses its auto industry, it means maybe 5 percent of the workforce will be on the street. Finance capital wants it all. The head of the FDIC wants $24 billion to help mortgage holders, and Paulson says no. GM wants $25 billion in loans, and Washington says no. The Democrats had better remember who put them back in power and in the White House.
Obama doesn't need to read histories of FDR's first 100 days to know something elementary. As economist Paul Craig Roberts remarked in CounterPunch recently, "A country that doesn't make anything doesn't need a financial sector as there is nothing to finance."
A country without decent manufacturing jobs doesn't have citizens and immigrants with the money to buy things, hence to keep the economy afloat. A country without a sane housing policy will end up with nothing but palaces and trailer parks. A government seeking a sane manufacturing policy, a sane housing program and a well-considered strategy for investment and recovery cannot hope to move in this direction with Wall Street financiers in the control room.
Copyright 2008 Creators Syndicate Inc.
This news arrived on: 11/21/2008
Printer Friendly Version | Send this page to a friend | Post Comment
Rate This Story:
Great - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Bad
Posted Comments:
12-05-2008 04:42
wrote:
no you pay ceos and execs and union leaders less and you pay the workers enough so they can take care of their families, save and not want to find a better job not what we do now
11-26-2008 23:14
JCE wrote:
I actually find it hard to believe that even the unions, as crooked as they are, and the execs, as crooked as they are, would pay the average worker more than 50 bucks, and even then thats not only expecting a lot, its probably more than they should be paid. Union officials maybe get 75 an hour, and the execs, maybe that in a new york minute, but not the ones who actually do the work. I would rather believe that Bush isn't guilty of premeditated murder and treason.
11-26-2008 22:46
Texas Katie wrote:
Let me see.....who was it that said "Go shopping!" as an antidote for the attack on 9/11???
That's all he could think of? Not anything having to do with helping your neighbor? Volunteering to assist with the cleanup? Or, how about simply taking some extra family time?
JCE, your premise would appear to be right on!
That's all he could think of? Not anything having to do with helping your neighbor? Volunteering to assist with the cleanup? Or, how about simply taking some extra family time?
JCE, your premise would appear to be right on!
11-24-2008 17:31
JCE wrote:
Maybe these overpaid union workers didn't save any money for the same reason that no one else in this country spends or saves wisely. Since the true machine age began, with all its factories, we have been encouraged by the rich rulers, and those who want to get rich, to consume consume consume. This means be wasteful, spend, even if you don't have any money, make it anyway you can, keep up with the joneses, make it look like you aren't poor, waste and consume and be financially irresponsible, because it is good for the economy, the business sector, and therefore the country(read rich rulers). Cab you say brainwashed? Now what else have we been brainwashed into believing? Listen to the politicians,the media, advertisers and the churches, then ask that question.
11-24-2008 12:21
Thomas Jefferson wrote:
Government help
I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.
Comment archive | Comment FAQ's
 |
 |
|
View Alexander Cockburn ezine stories by date or visit the complete archive |
The ArcaMax Politics channel is one of 70 content categories offered by ArcaMax Publishing on this ... |
Body Mass
